The Assessment of Results obtained in Transonic Wind Tunnels
F. O'Hara
Abstract
F. O'Hara
Abstract
The development of wind tunnel sections with partly open walls has made it possible to operate at continuously variable speeds through the transonic range up to low supersonic speeds. Some consideration must be given, however, to the general reliability of the measurements in these tunnels of the aerodynamic characteristics of air vehicles or missiles. A comparative assessment of the possible overall errors in force and pressure measurements in relation to desirable standards of accuracy is, in fact, required. A number of points connected with such an assessment are briefly discussed (mainly on the basis of experience in the 3 ft. tunnel at R.A.E., Bedford) in this paper, which touches on flow uniformity, accuracy of model manufacture, and interference effects, including a comparison between tunnel and free flight model results; illustrative examples of results for an aircraft model, with some full scale flight comparisons, are discussed briefly and a few comments are made on the problems associated with the achievement of representative flow conditions on sting–mounted models at transonic speeds.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The development of wind tunnel sections with partly open walls has made it possible to operate at continuously variable speeds through the transonic range up to low supersonic speeds. Some consideration must be given, however, to the general reliability of the measurements in these tunnels of the aerodynamic characteristics of air vehicles or missiles. A comparative assessment of the possible overall errors in force and pressure measurements in relation to desirable standards of accuracy is, in fact, required. A number of points connected with such an assessment are briefly discussed (mainly on the basis of experience in the 3 ft. tunnel at R.A.E., Bedford) in this paper, which touches on flow uniformity, accuracy of model manufacture, and interference effects, including a comparison between tunnel and free flight model results; illustrative examples of results for an aircraft model, with some full scale flight comparisons, are discussed briefly and a few comments are made on the problems associated with the achievement of representative flow conditions on sting–mounted models at transonic speeds.
Key concepts: Transonic, Wind tunnel, Aerodynamics, Supersonic speed, Aerospace engineering, Range (aeronautics), Marine engineering, Subsonic and transonic wind tunnel