1992•PubMedRequires access

[Comparative study of postoperative complications in primary and secondary implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lens in cataract surgery for diabetic patients].

Yasuyuki Suzuki, Kenzo Ohtsuki, T Goto, Y Sumiya

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Postoperative complications of diabetic cataract cases with active stage diabetic retinopathy, which underwent simultaneous extracapsular lens extraction (ECCE) and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC-IOL) implantation in 84 eyes, ECCE only in 38 eyes and secondary implantation of PC-IOL after ECCE in 23 eyes, were studied. In the eyes of the primary PC-IOL implantation group, fibrous response in 35 eyes (42%), posterior iris synechia in 10 eyes (12%), progression of diabetic retinopathy in 13 eyes (16%), after cataract in 11 eyes (13%), pupil capture in 4 eyes (5%) and decentration of lens optics in 3 eyes (4%) were appeared, while in the ECCE only group, fibrous response in 11 eyes (29%), posterior iris synechia in 4 eyes (11%), after cataract in 11 eyes (29%), progression of diabetic retinopathy in 6 eyes (16%) were observed. On the other hand, in the secondary PC-IOL implantation group, only fibrous response was appeared in 1 eye (4%), Although PC-IOL implantation has been so far considered contraindication in cases with cataract combined with active stage retinopathy, the present studies strongly suggest that secondary PC-IOL implantation would be good indication in these cases whose blood sugar was properly controlled and the retinopathy was burned out by panretinal photocoagulation soon after ECCE.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Postoperative complications of diabetic cataract cases with active stage diabetic retinopathy, which underwent simultaneous extracapsular lens extraction (ECCE) and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC-IOL) implantation in 84 eyes, ECCE only in 38 eyes and secondary implantation of PC-IOL after ECCE in 23 eyes, were studied. In the eyes of the primary PC-IOL implantation group, fibrous response in 35 eyes (42%), posterior iris synechia in 10 eyes (12%), progression of diabetic retinopathy in 13 eyes (16%), after cataract in 11 eyes (13%), pupil capture in 4 eyes (5%) and decentration of lens optics in 3 eyes (4%) were appeared, while in the ECCE only group, fibrous response in 11 eyes (29%), posterior iris synechia in 4 eyes (11%), after cataract in 11 eyes (29%), progression of diabetic retinopathy in 6 eyes (16%) were observed. On the other hand, in the secondary PC-IOL implantation group, only fibrous response was appeared in 1 eye (4%), Although PC-IOL implantation has been so far considered contraindication in cases with cataract combined with active stage retinopathy, the present studies strongly suggest that secondary PC-IOL implantation would be good indication in these cases whose blood sugar was properly controlled and the retinopathy was burned out by panretinal photocoagulation soon after ECCE.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Postoperative complications of diabetic cataract cases with active stage diabetic retinopathy, which underwent simultaneous extracapsular lens extraction (ECCE) and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC-IOL) implantation in 84 eyes, ECCE only in 38 eyes and secondary implantation of PC-IOL after ECCE in 23 eyes, were studied. In the eyes of the primary PC-IOL implantation group, fibrous response in 35 eyes (42%), posterior iris synechia in 10 eyes (12%), progression of diabetic retinopathy in 13 eyes (16%), after cataract in 11 eyes (13%), pupil capture in 4 eyes (5%) and decentration of lens optics in 3 eyes (4%) were appeared, while in the ECCE only group, fibrous response in 11 eyes (29%), posterior iris synechia in 4 eyes (11%), after cataract in 11 eyes (29%), progression of diabetic retinopathy in 6 eyes (16%) were observed. On the other hand, in the secondary PC-IOL implantation group, only fibrous response was appeared in 1 eye (4%), Although PC-IOL implantation has been so far considered contraindication in cases with cataract combined with active stage retinopathy, the present studies strongly suggest that secondary PC-IOL implantation would be good indication in these cases whose blood sugar was properly controlled and the retinopathy was burned out by panretinal photocoagulation soon after ECCE.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ophthalmology, Synechia, Intraocular lens, Diabetic retinopathy, Capsulorhexis, Surgery, Visual acuity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparative study of postoperative complications in primary and secondary implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lens in cataract surgery for diabetic patients]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens