2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Oak Regeneration: Four Years After Three Harvesting Treatments in a North Alabama Upland Hardwood Stand

David I. Shostak, Michael S. Golden, Mark R. Dubois

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract-Fourth year regeneration of upland oaks (Quercus spp.) was compared within three harvesting treatments in the mountains of northern Alabama. Six four-acre experimen-tal blocks were established on north facing slopes. Each of the three harvesting treatments (deferment cutting, strip clearcutting, and block clearcutting) was randomly assigned to two treatment blocks. Major oaks present were white oak (0. a/b & northern red oak (Q. rubra), and chestnut oak (Q. p&us). Densities and stocking levels of non-sprout origin non-overtopped oak reproduction were related to treatment, topographic position, and pre-harvest competition cover. The overall contribution of the non-sprout oak regeneration was low. Post harvest germination and advance reproduction contributed equally to the success-ful fourth year reproduction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract-Fourth year regeneration of upland oaks (Quercus spp.) was compared within three harvesting treatments in the mountains of northern Alabama. Six four-acre experimen-tal blocks were established on north facing slopes. Each of the three harvesting treatments (deferment cutting, strip clearcutting, and block clearcutting) was randomly assigned to two treatment blocks. Major oaks present were white oak (0. a/b & northern red oak (Q. rubra), and chestnut oak (Q. p&us). Densities and stocking levels of non-sprout origin non-overtopped oak reproduction were related to treatment, topographic position, and pre-harvest competition cover. The overall contribution of the non-sprout oak regeneration was low. Post harvest germination and advance reproduction contributed equally to the success-ful fourth year reproduction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract-Fourth year regeneration of upland oaks (Quercus spp.) was compared within three harvesting treatments in the mountains of northern Alabama. Six four-acre experimen-tal blocks were established on north facing slopes. Each of the three harvesting treatments (deferment cutting, strip clearcutting, and block clearcutting) was randomly assigned to two treatment blocks. Major oaks present were white oak (0. a/b & northern red oak (Q. rubra), and chestnut oak (Q. p&us). Densities and stocking levels of non-sprout origin non-overtopped oak reproduction were related to treatment, topographic position, and pre-harvest competition cover. The overall contribution of the non-sprout oak regeneration was low. Post harvest germination and advance reproduction contributed equally to the success-ful fourth year reproduction.

Key concepts: Hardwood, Regeneration (biology), Forestry, Agroforestry, Natural regeneration, Geography, Environmental science, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Oak Regeneration: Four Years After Three Harvesting Treatments in a North Alabama Upland Hardwood Stand — Research Paper | ScholarLens