The Effect of pH Adjustment of 2% Mepivacaine on Epidural Anesthesia
Giorgio Capogna, Danilo Celleno, Vincenzo Tagariello
Abstract
Giorgio Capogna, Danilo Celleno, Vincenzo Tagariello
Abstract
Two-hundred men, scheduled for elective meniscectomy under epidural anesthesia, were randomly assigned to receive either a standard 2% mepivacaine solution (n = 100) or a pH adjusted 2% mepivacaine solution (pHAS, n = 100). The pHAS was freshly prepared before the block by adding 0.1 mEq of NaHCO3 per ml of mepivacaine solution. After a test-dose, the anesthetic solution was injected to produce a level of sensory anesthesia to T10. The mean duration of anesthesia and the mean dose of mepivacaine used were comparable between the groups. Patients in the pHAS group showed a significant shortening of onset time in T10 and in S2 segment (p less than .001). Grade 3 motor blockade was achieved in the same number of patients, but a faster motor block was observed in the pHAS group (p less than .05). Regression of both sensory and motor blockade in the two groups was not significantly different.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Two-hundred men, scheduled for elective meniscectomy under epidural anesthesia, were randomly assigned to receive either a standard 2% mepivacaine solution (n = 100) or a pH adjusted 2% mepivacaine solution (pHAS, n = 100). The pHAS was freshly prepared before the block by adding 0.1 mEq of NaHCO3 per ml of mepivacaine solution. After a test-dose, the anesthetic solution was injected to produce a level of sensory anesthesia to T10. The mean duration of anesthesia and the mean dose of mepivacaine used were comparable between the groups. Patients in the pHAS group showed a significant shortening of onset time in T10 and in S2 segment (p less than .001). Grade 3 motor blockade was achieved in the same number of patients, but a faster motor block was observed in the pHAS group (p less than .05). Regression of both sensory and motor blockade in the two groups was not significantly different.
Key concepts: Mepivacaine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Blockade, Motor block, Anesthetic, Local anesthetic, Epidural block