2004Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

What is a Democratic Audit?

Christopher Lord

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It is commonly remarked that the European Union (EU) is a political system in democratic deficit. But what is the nature of that deficit? Is it offset by any democratic achievements? Do any democratic qualities or deficiencies pertain to the EU’s political system as a whole, or to some parts of it more than others? Does the Union perform worse or better in relation to some attributes of democratic rule than others? Does it even make much sense to debate the presence or absence of a democratic deficit at all? Do answers to these questions vary with which model of democracy is used, and, if so, does that mean those who ask ‘how democratic is the EU?’ need also to have some clear idea of why they believe the EU ought to be democratic in the first place? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is commonly remarked that the European Union (EU) is a political system in democratic deficit. But what is the nature of that deficit? Is it offset by any democratic achievements? Do any democratic qualities or deficiencies pertain to the EU’s political system as a whole, or to some parts of it more than others? Does the Union perform worse or better in relation to some attributes of democratic rule than others? Does it even make much sense to debate the presence or absence of a democratic deficit at all? Do answers to these questions vary with which model of democracy is used, and, if so, does that mean those who ask ‘how democratic is the EU?’ need also to have some clear idea of why they believe the EU ought to be democratic in the first place? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is commonly remarked that the European Union (EU) is a political system in democratic deficit. But what is the nature of that deficit? Is it offset by any democratic achievements? Do any democratic qualities or deficiencies pertain to the EU’s political system as a whole, or to some parts of it more than others? Does the Union perform worse or better in relation to some attributes of democratic rule than others? Does it even make much sense to debate the presence or absence of a democratic deficit at all? Do answers to these questions vary with which model of democracy is used, and, if so, does that mean those who ask ‘how democratic is the EU?’ need also to have some clear idea of why they believe the EU ought to be democratic in the first place? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Democracy, Democratic deficit, Politics, Political science, European union, Political economy, Law and economics, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What is a Democratic Audit? — Research Paper | ScholarLens