1998PubMedRequires access

[Detrusor instability--an important but underestimated factor in urinary incontinence in women].

R. Dimitrov, N Doganov

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

157 consecutive female patients complaining of urinary incontinence were studied by history and urodynamics. 21 of them (13.4%) demonstrated urge-incontinence due to severe detrusor instability, 20 (12.7%) showed mixed (both urge and stress) incontinence, 14 (9%) only detrusor instability and 12 (7.6%)--stress incontinence accompanied by detrusor instability. Pure stress incontinence was diagnosed in 79 cases (50.3%) while 11 patients (7%) manifested no abnormality during the urodynamics. A total of 67 patients (42.7%) showed urodynamic evidence of detrusor overactivity. In 55 (35% of the studied subjects) it was the main urodynamic finding. The prevalence of detrusor instability was higher among those with recurrent incontinence and was the highest (60%) among the women with more than one previous operations. When urge incontinence was present it occurred at detrusor pressures lower than the maximum urethral closure pressure, which implies possible failure of the sphincteric mechanisms associated with detrusor instability. 14% of the women with detrusor instability did not report complaints typical for this disorder but had history of stress incontinence alone. The authors confirm the necessity of objective assessment of the lower urinary tract in all cases with history suspicious of detrusor instability as well as when surgical treatment for stress incontinence is planned.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

157 consecutive female patients complaining of urinary incontinence were studied by history and urodynamics. 21 of them (13.4%) demonstrated urge-incontinence due to severe detrusor instability, 20 (12.7%) showed mixed (both urge and stress) incontinence, 14 (9%) only detrusor instability and 12 (7.6%)--stress incontinence accompanied by detrusor instability. Pure stress incontinence was diagnosed in 79 cases (50.3%) while 11 patients (7%) manifested no abnormality during the urodynamics. A total of 67 patients (42.7%) showed urodynamic evidence of detrusor overactivity. In 55 (35% of the studied subjects) it was the main urodynamic finding. The prevalence of detrusor instability was higher among those with recurrent incontinence and was the highest (60%) among the women with more than one previous operations. When urge incontinence was present it occurred at detrusor pressures lower than the maximum urethral closure pressure, which implies possible failure of the sphincteric mechanisms associated with detrusor instability. 14% of the women with detrusor instability did not report complaints typical for this disorder but had history of stress incontinence alone. The authors confirm the necessity of objective assessment of the lower urinary tract in all cases with history suspicious of detrusor instability as well as when surgical treatment for stress incontinence is planned.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

157 consecutive female patients complaining of urinary incontinence were studied by history and urodynamics. 21 of them (13.4%) demonstrated urge-incontinence due to severe detrusor instability, 20 (12.7%) showed mixed (both urge and stress) incontinence, 14 (9%) only detrusor instability and 12 (7.6%)--stress incontinence accompanied by detrusor instability. Pure stress incontinence was diagnosed in 79 cases (50.3%) while 11 patients (7%) manifested no abnormality during the urodynamics. A total of 67 patients (42.7%) showed urodynamic evidence of detrusor overactivity. In 55 (35% of the studied subjects) it was the main urodynamic finding. The prevalence of detrusor instability was higher among those with recurrent incontinence and was the highest (60%) among the women with more than one previous operations. When urge incontinence was present it occurred at detrusor pressures lower than the maximum urethral closure pressure, which implies possible failure of the sphincteric mechanisms associated with detrusor instability. 14% of the women with detrusor instability did not report complaints typical for this disorder but had history of stress incontinence alone. The authors confirm the necessity of objective assessment of the lower urinary tract in all cases with history suspicious of detrusor instability as well as when surgical treatment for stress incontinence is planned.

Key concepts: Detrusor instability, Medicine, Urology, Urge incontinence, Urinary incontinence, Stress incontinence, Detrusor muscle, Urinary bladder

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Detrusor instability--an important but underestimated factor in urinary incontinence in women]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens