1991PubMedRequires access

A comparison of polypropylene mesh and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of contaminated abdominal wall defects--an experimental study.

N W Law, Hugh Logan Ellis

Open publisher page 72 citations

Abstract

Abdominal wall defects created in Sprague-Dawley rats were repaired with either polypropylene mesh (PPM) or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch (PTFE). Tensiometric studies of abdominal wall strength showed that PPM and expanded PTFE provided a strong repair in uninfected wounds. Wounds reconstructed with expanded PTFE and contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus had a weak interface between the patch and the abdominal wall fascia. The strength of the interface was inadequate because collagen ingrowth in the material was inhibited. In contrast, the wound strength of PPM was unaffected by the presence of bacterial contamination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abdominal wall defects created in Sprague-Dawley rats were repaired with either polypropylene mesh (PPM) or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch (PTFE). Tensiometric studies of abdominal wall strength showed that PPM and expanded PTFE provided a strong repair in uninfected wounds. Wounds reconstructed with expanded PTFE and contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus had a weak interface between the patch and the abdominal wall fascia. The strength of the interface was inadequate because collagen ingrowth in the material was inhibited. In contrast, the wound strength of PPM was unaffected by the presence of bacterial contamination.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 72 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abdominal wall defects created in Sprague-Dawley rats were repaired with either polypropylene mesh (PPM) or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch (PTFE). Tensiometric studies of abdominal wall strength showed that PPM and expanded PTFE provided a strong repair in uninfected wounds. Wounds reconstructed with expanded PTFE and contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus had a weak interface between the patch and the abdominal wall fascia. The strength of the interface was inadequate because collagen ingrowth in the material was inhibited. In contrast, the wound strength of PPM was unaffected by the presence of bacterial contamination.

Key concepts: Medicine, Abdominal wall, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Polypropylene, Surgical mesh, Fascia, Contamination, Abdominal surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of polypropylene mesh and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of contaminated abdominal wall defects--an experimental study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens