2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Earnings of temporary versus permanent employees

Diane Galarneau

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

In the early 1990s, non-standard employment—temporary work, part-time work and self employ-ment—seemed to be escalating at a worrisome rate. This led to fears that employment conditions were deteriorating for a substantial percentage of workers (OECD 2002; Krahn 1995; Schellenberg 1996). From 1997 to 2003, temporary work grew much more rap-idly than permanent employment, despite a period of economic growth and favourable employment con-ditions. Indeed, GDP expanded during the entire period and the unemployment rate stayed below 8%. Temporary jobs are generally less well paid than per-manent ones, offer fewer employee benefits, are less likely to offer on-the-job training, and are precarious. Indeed, temporary work does not seem to be the first choice of many who do it. Recent data are sparse, but in 1994, two-thirds of temporary employees would

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the early 1990s, non-standard employment—temporary work, part-time work and self employ-ment—seemed to be escalating at a worrisome rate. This led to fears that employment conditions were deteriorating for a substantial percentage of workers (OECD 2002; Krahn 1995; Schellenberg 1996). From 1997 to 2003, temporary work grew much more rap-idly than permanent employment, despite a period of economic growth and favourable employment con-ditions. Indeed, GDP expanded during the entire period and the unemployment rate stayed below 8%. Temporary jobs are generally less well paid than per-manent ones, offer fewer employee benefits, are less likely to offer on-the-job training, and are precarious. Indeed, temporary work does not seem to be the first choice of many who do it. Recent data are sparse, but in 1994, two-thirds of temporary employees would

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the early 1990s, non-standard employment—temporary work, part-time work and self employ-ment—seemed to be escalating at a worrisome rate. This led to fears that employment conditions were deteriorating for a substantial percentage of workers (OECD 2002; Krahn 1995; Schellenberg 1996). From 1997 to 2003, temporary work grew much more rap-idly than permanent employment, despite a period of economic growth and favourable employment con-ditions. Indeed, GDP expanded during the entire period and the unemployment rate stayed below 8%. Temporary jobs are generally less well paid than per-manent ones, offer fewer employee benefits, are less likely to offer on-the-job training, and are precarious. Indeed, temporary work does not seem to be the first choice of many who do it. Recent data are sparse, but in 1994, two-thirds of temporary employees would

Key concepts: Earnings, Labour economics, Unemployment, Work (physics), Temporary work, Economics, Flexibility (engineering), Position (finance)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Earnings of temporary versus permanent employees — Research Paper | ScholarLens