1974Clinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsRequires access

Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups

Donald R. Taves

Open publisher page 907 citations

Abstract

This paper describes a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups to minimize differences between the groups, not only in the number of patients but in patient characteristics. Testing the method by computer simulations, using data on 40 patients with 15 variates each, demonstrates a four‐ to fivefold reduction of the probability of severe imbalance, relative to randomization. Minimization can maintain tight control of one variate, comparable to the currently acceptable experimental design of blocking, while reduCing the probability of severe imbalance in the other 14 variates by a factor of 3. It also compares favorably with accepted methods regarding susceptibility to experimenter bias. Therefore, it is suggested that minimization should replace randomization in assigning patients in clinical trials.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper describes a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups to minimize differences between the groups, not only in the number of patients but in patient characteristics. Testing the method by computer simulations, using data on 40 patients with 15 variates each, demonstrates a four‐ to fivefold reduction of the probability of severe imbalance, relative to randomization. Minimization can maintain tight control of one variate, comparable to the currently acceptable experimental design of blocking, while reduCing the probability of severe imbalance in the other 14 variates by a factor of 3. It also compares favorably with accepted methods regarding susceptibility to experimenter bias. Therefore, it is suggested that minimization should replace randomization in assigning patients in clinical trials.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 907 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper describes a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups to minimize differences between the groups, not only in the number of patients but in patient characteristics. Testing the method by computer simulations, using data on 40 patients with 15 variates each, demonstrates a four‐ to fivefold reduction of the probability of severe imbalance, relative to randomization. Minimization can maintain tight control of one variate, comparable to the currently acceptable experimental design of blocking, while reduCing the probability of severe imbalance in the other 14 variates by a factor of 3. It also compares favorably with accepted methods regarding susceptibility to experimenter bias. Therefore, it is suggested that minimization should replace randomization in assigning patients in clinical trials.

Key concepts: Randomization, Minification, Random variate, Treatment and control groups, Reduction (mathematics), Control (management), Statistics, Clinical trial

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups — Research Paper | ScholarLens