1990•PubMedRequires access

[Antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologic surgery].

J Luzuriaga Graf, Sánchez Chavez O, Arauz Arauz E

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, we studied 130 patients who were submitted to prostate surgery. These patients were divided into 3 groups. Overall morbidity was lower for the patient group that had received antibiotic prophylaxis (Netilmicin, 3 doses) than for the group on placebo and the group on antibiotics postoperatively. The incidence of significant bacteriuria for the group on Netilmicin was less at 7 days (7.5%) and at 30 days (20.5%) than for the other groups: (22.55%) and (49.36%) at 7 and 30 days, respectively. The foregoing data indicate that preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis should be used for periods less than 24 h in all noninfected patients undergoing prostate surgery. The cost of antibiotic therapy, presence of opportunistic organisms and the duration of hospital stay are reduced by antimicrobial prophylaxis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, we studied 130 patients who were submitted to prostate surgery. These patients were divided into 3 groups. Overall morbidity was lower for the patient group that had received antibiotic prophylaxis (Netilmicin, 3 doses) than for the group on placebo and the group on antibiotics postoperatively. The incidence of significant bacteriuria for the group on Netilmicin was less at 7 days (7.5%) and at 30 days (20.5%) than for the other groups: (22.55%) and (49.36%) at 7 and 30 days, respectively. The foregoing data indicate that preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis should be used for periods less than 24 h in all noninfected patients undergoing prostate surgery. The cost of antibiotic therapy, presence of opportunistic organisms and the duration of hospital stay are reduced by antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, we studied 130 patients who were submitted to prostate surgery. These patients were divided into 3 groups. Overall morbidity was lower for the patient group that had received antibiotic prophylaxis (Netilmicin, 3 doses) than for the group on placebo and the group on antibiotics postoperatively. The incidence of significant bacteriuria for the group on Netilmicin was less at 7 days (7.5%) and at 30 days (20.5%) than for the other groups: (22.55%) and (49.36%) at 7 and 30 days, respectively. The foregoing data indicate that preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis should be used for periods less than 24 h in all noninfected patients undergoing prostate surgery. The cost of antibiotic therapy, presence of opportunistic organisms and the duration of hospital stay are reduced by antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Netilmicin, Bacteriuria, Antibiotics, Antimicrobial, Incidence (geometry), Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologic surgery]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens