2010ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University)Requires access

Creating a Better Funding System for Michigan.

Daniel M. Quinn

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In 1994, Michigan voters approved a ballot initiative that transferred the power in Michigan’s education system from local communities to the state. Proposal A succeeded in slowing the growth of local property taxes and narrowing the gap between the richest and poorest districts in Michigan. However, due to a decade of sluggish economic growth, revenue available to schools has deteriorated, placing strain on local school districts facing declining enrollment and expanded school choice. This commentary considers Michigan’s current educational funding system, explores two recently released school finance reports, and offers recommendations for funding reform. The history of Michigan’s Proposal A is explored along with the challenge of providing additional revenues in an anti-tax climate. The analysis and recommendations are relevant to states facing similar problems with regard to fostering funding adequacy and equity in public education.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1994, Michigan voters approved a ballot initiative that transferred the power in Michigan’s education system from local communities to the state. Proposal A succeeded in slowing the growth of local property taxes and narrowing the gap between the richest and poorest districts in Michigan. However, due to a decade of sluggish economic growth, revenue available to schools has deteriorated, placing strain on local school districts facing declining enrollment and expanded school choice. This commentary considers Michigan’s current educational funding system, explores two recently released school finance reports, and offers recommendations for funding reform. The history of Michigan’s Proposal A is explored along with the challenge of providing additional revenues in an anti-tax climate. The analysis and recommendations are relevant to states facing similar problems with regard to fostering funding adequacy and equity in public education.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1994, Michigan voters approved a ballot initiative that transferred the power in Michigan’s education system from local communities to the state. Proposal A succeeded in slowing the growth of local property taxes and narrowing the gap between the richest and poorest districts in Michigan. However, due to a decade of sluggish economic growth, revenue available to schools has deteriorated, placing strain on local school districts facing declining enrollment and expanded school choice. This commentary considers Michigan’s current educational funding system, explores two recently released school finance reports, and offers recommendations for funding reform. The history of Michigan’s Proposal A is explored along with the challenge of providing additional revenues in an anti-tax climate. The analysis and recommendations are relevant to states facing similar problems with regard to fostering funding adequacy and equity in public education.

Key concepts: Political science, Environmental science, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Creating a Better Funding System for Michigan. — Research Paper | ScholarLens