Evaluation of antihypertensive therapy: discrepancies between office and ambulatory recorded blood pressure.
Bernard Waeber, Blaise Rutschmann, Juerg Nussberger, Heinrich Brunner
Abstract
Bernard Waeber, Blaise Rutschmann, Juerg Nussberger, Heinrich Brunner
Abstract
Non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has proved to be very useful in investigating hypertensive patients. So far, almost everything known about this technique is based on studies performed in specialized centers. We summarize here the results of two trials in which private physicians used ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs. The results found in this clinical setting were very similar to those observed previously in specialized clinics. In the individual patient, the level of ambulatory recorded pressure could not be predicted from blood pressure readings taken at the doctor's office. Furthermore, the blood pressure response to antihypertensive therapy was more reproducible when evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring than by the doctor. It appears, therefore, that non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is also useful in everyday practice for the management of hypertensive patients.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has proved to be very useful in investigating hypertensive patients. So far, almost everything known about this technique is based on studies performed in specialized centers. We summarize here the results of two trials in which private physicians used ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs. The results found in this clinical setting were very similar to those observed previously in specialized clinics. In the individual patient, the level of ambulatory recorded pressure could not be predicted from blood pressure readings taken at the doctor's office. Furthermore, the blood pressure response to antihypertensive therapy was more reproducible when evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring than by the doctor. It appears, therefore, that non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is also useful in everyday practice for the management of hypertensive patients.
Key concepts: Medicine, Ambulatory blood pressure, Blood pressure, Ambulatory, Intensive care medicine, Clinical trial, Cardiology, Internal medicine