1973•Unpublished venueRequires access

Contributory Negligence and Damages

Roberick L. Denyer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We have now looked at the employer’s common law duties towards his employees with regard to their safety, his statutory duties and his vicarious liability. All of them, somewhere along the line, involve ‘fault’ on the part of the employer or someone for whom he is responsible. It follows, then, that he should be responsible for compensating an injured workman only to the extent that he is at ‘fault’. Any part of the injuries caused by the workman himself are the workman’s own responsibility. The law recognises this by the concept of contributory negligence. An injured person’s damages are to be scaled down by the amount which he himself is to blame for the accident. This position is a result of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act, 1945. It is not proposed to deal with this in detail; suffice it to say that, depending on the degree of fault of the plaintiff, his damages may be reduced by anything up to 100 per cent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We have now looked at the employer’s common law duties towards his employees with regard to their safety, his statutory duties and his vicarious liability. All of them, somewhere along the line, involve ‘fault’ on the part of the employer or someone for whom he is responsible. It follows, then, that he should be responsible for compensating an injured workman only to the extent that he is at ‘fault’. Any part of the injuries caused by the workman himself are the workman’s own responsibility. The law recognises this by the concept of contributory negligence. An injured person’s damages are to be scaled down by the amount which he himself is to blame for the accident. This position is a result of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act, 1945. It is not proposed to deal with this in detail; suffice it to say that, depending on the degree of fault of the plaintiff, his damages may be reduced by anything up to 100 per cent.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We have now looked at the employer’s common law duties towards his employees with regard to their safety, his statutory duties and his vicarious liability. All of them, somewhere along the line, involve ‘fault’ on the part of the employer or someone for whom he is responsible. It follows, then, that he should be responsible for compensating an injured workman only to the extent that he is at ‘fault’. Any part of the injuries caused by the workman himself are the workman’s own responsibility. The law recognises this by the concept of contributory negligence. An injured person’s damages are to be scaled down by the amount which he himself is to blame for the accident. This position is a result of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act, 1945. It is not proposed to deal with this in detail; suffice it to say that, depending on the degree of fault of the plaintiff, his damages may be reduced by anything up to 100 per cent.

Key concepts: Contributory negligence, Damages, Vicarious liability, Plaintiff, Blame, Law, Statutory law, Liability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Contributory Negligence and Damages — Research Paper | ScholarLens