2016Unpublished venueRequires access

The Clash of Institutions: Germany in European Monetary Affairs

Kathleen R. McNamara, Erik Jones

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Every international monetary regime, one scholar has noted, rests on a particular political order.1 The recent European experience with mone tary cooperation is no exception. The political order that the institutions and practices of European monetary integration reflect is a German one, based on German norms and German money. Yet students of European integration have not fully come to terms with the dynamics of German influence in Europe's monetary affairs, despite a growing literature oh the subject.2 How deep is the support across the European polities for Ger man-led monetary integration, and how much support is there within Germany for its particular political role? Should Germany be seen as a benign force holding Europe together, as a malign hegemonic presence forcing European Union (EU) members to dance to its monetary tune, or—as we will argue—something altogether different? In this essay, we seek to contribute to these debates. We contend that Germany leads by example, if at all, and that this form of leadership is not adequate to ensure a stable future for Europe. Our analysis begins with a review of the history of European monetary integration. We argue that exchange rate cooperation is best understood in terms of the projection of German standards and their acceptance by other European countries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Every international monetary regime, one scholar has noted, rests on a particular political order.1 The recent European experience with mone tary cooperation is no exception. The political order that the institutions and practices of European monetary integration reflect is a German one, based on German norms and German money. Yet students of European integration have not fully come to terms with the dynamics of German influence in Europe's monetary affairs, despite a growing literature oh the subject.2 How deep is the support across the European polities for Ger man-led monetary integration, and how much support is there within Germany for its particular political role? Should Germany be seen as a benign force holding Europe together, as a malign hegemonic presence forcing European Union (EU) members to dance to its monetary tune, or—as we will argue—something altogether different? In this essay, we seek to contribute to these debates. We contend that Germany leads by example, if at all, and that this form of leadership is not adequate to ensure a stable future for Europe. Our analysis begins with a review of the history of European monetary integration. We argue that exchange rate cooperation is best understood in terms of the projection of German standards and their acceptance by other European countries.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Every international monetary regime, one scholar has noted, rests on a particular political order.1 The recent European experience with mone tary cooperation is no exception. The political order that the institutions and practices of European monetary integration reflect is a German one, based on German norms and German money. Yet students of European integration have not fully come to terms with the dynamics of German influence in Europe's monetary affairs, despite a growing literature oh the subject.2 How deep is the support across the European polities for Ger man-led monetary integration, and how much support is there within Germany for its particular political role? Should Germany be seen as a benign force holding Europe together, as a malign hegemonic presence forcing European Union (EU) members to dance to its monetary tune, or—as we will argue—something altogether different? In this essay, we seek to contribute to these debates. We contend that Germany leads by example, if at all, and that this form of leadership is not adequate to ensure a stable future for Europe. Our analysis begins with a review of the history of European monetary integration. We argue that exchange rate cooperation is best understood in terms of the projection of German standards and their acceptance by other European countries.

Key concepts: German, Politics, Hegemony, European integration, European union, Political science, European Monetary System, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Clash of Institutions: Germany in European Monetary Affairs — Research Paper | ScholarLens