2009PubMedRequires access

[Clinical evaluation of two-implant-supported single molar restoration].

Wei Bi, Youcheng Yu, Qing Wang, Yiming Gong, Jian Sun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the clinical effect of two-implant-supported single molar restoration with wider interdental space. METHODS: 32 subjects who presented 38 single molar missing with wider interdental space were involved in this study. Two-implant-supported single molar restoration was performed with Branemark system or Replace system. The stability of the implant restoration, periodontal condition, and peri-implant bone absorption were investigated 3 months, 1 year and 3 years after restoration. The periodontal condition was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test or Chi-square test and the peri-implant bone absorption was analyzed by paired t test using SPSS13.0 software package. RESULTS: Among 76 implants, one implant was lost in 2 weeks after surgery, which had been re-implanted successfully 3 months later. After loading, the survival rate of 76 implants was 100% during the next three years with perfect osseointegration. No significant differences for the plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing depth were found 3 months, 1 year and 3 years after restoration (P>0.05). The bone absorption of peri-implant was (0.56+/-0.14)mm at 3-month and stable trends were shown at 1 year (0.15+/-0.05)mm and 3 years (0.17+/-0.06)mm, both of which were significantly lower than that at 3-month (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Two-implant-supported single restoration is suitable for single molar missing with wider interdental space.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the clinical effect of two-implant-supported single molar restoration with wider interdental space. METHODS: 32 subjects who presented 38 single molar missing with wider interdental space were involved in this study. Two-implant-supported single molar restoration was performed with Branemark system or Replace system. The stability of the implant restoration, periodontal condition, and peri-implant bone absorption were investigated 3 months, 1 year and 3 years after restoration. The periodontal condition was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test or Chi-square test and the peri-implant bone absorption was analyzed by paired t test using SPSS13.0 software package. RESULTS: Among 76 implants, one implant was lost in 2 weeks after surgery, which had been re-implanted successfully 3 months later. After loading, the survival rate of 76 implants was 100% during the next three years with perfect osseointegration. No significant differences for the plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing depth were found 3 months, 1 year and 3 years after restoration (P>0.05). The bone absorption of peri-implant was (0.56+/-0.14)mm at 3-month and stable trends were shown at 1 year (0.15+/-0.05)mm and 3 years (0.17+/-0.06)mm, both of which were significantly lower than that at 3-month (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Two-implant-supported single restoration is suitable for single molar missing with wider interdental space.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the clinical effect of two-implant-supported single molar restoration with wider interdental space. METHODS: 32 subjects who presented 38 single molar missing with wider interdental space were involved in this study. Two-implant-supported single molar restoration was performed with Branemark system or Replace system. The stability of the implant restoration, periodontal condition, and peri-implant bone absorption were investigated 3 months, 1 year and 3 years after restoration. The periodontal condition was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test or Chi-square test and the peri-implant bone absorption was analyzed by paired t test using SPSS13.0 software package. RESULTS: Among 76 implants, one implant was lost in 2 weeks after surgery, which had been re-implanted successfully 3 months later. After loading, the survival rate of 76 implants was 100% during the next three years with perfect osseointegration. No significant differences for the plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing depth were found 3 months, 1 year and 3 years after restoration (P>0.05). The bone absorption of peri-implant was (0.56+/-0.14)mm at 3-month and stable trends were shown at 1 year (0.15+/-0.05)mm and 3 years (0.17+/-0.06)mm, both of which were significantly lower than that at 3-month (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Two-implant-supported single restoration is suitable for single molar missing with wider interdental space.

Key concepts: Interdental consonant, Osseointegration, Dentistry, Implant, Molar, Medicine, Bleeding on probing, Wilcoxon signed-rank test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Clinical evaluation of two-implant-supported single molar restoration]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens