2001PubMedRequires access

[Diagnostic methods for obstruction of the upper urinary tract: which tests are available in 2001].

Fabien Saint, Marie-Laetitia Saint, D. Legeais, L. Lemaître, J. P. Bailleul, J. Biserte

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The presence of upper urinary tract obstruction, its site and its nature can be determined and the most appropriate treatment can be defined in the majority of clinical cases. However, in some circumstances, non-invasive or minimally invasive methods, such as ultrasonography, intravenous urography, urography with diuretic test, conventional and diuretic nephrography and MR urography, are unable to confirm the presence of obstruction, requiring assessment of the upper urinary tract by antegrade pyelomanometry. This investigation measures the pressure in the upper urinary tract perfused at a constant rate by a percutaneous catheter and allows evaluation of the obstruction. The authors discuss the place of the various upper urinary tract investigations to confirm the definitive diagnosis of upper urinary tract obstruction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The presence of upper urinary tract obstruction, its site and its nature can be determined and the most appropriate treatment can be defined in the majority of clinical cases. However, in some circumstances, non-invasive or minimally invasive methods, such as ultrasonography, intravenous urography, urography with diuretic test, conventional and diuretic nephrography and MR urography, are unable to confirm the presence of obstruction, requiring assessment of the upper urinary tract by antegrade pyelomanometry. This investigation measures the pressure in the upper urinary tract perfused at a constant rate by a percutaneous catheter and allows evaluation of the obstruction. The authors discuss the place of the various upper urinary tract investigations to confirm the definitive diagnosis of upper urinary tract obstruction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The presence of upper urinary tract obstruction, its site and its nature can be determined and the most appropriate treatment can be defined in the majority of clinical cases. However, in some circumstances, non-invasive or minimally invasive methods, such as ultrasonography, intravenous urography, urography with diuretic test, conventional and diuretic nephrography and MR urography, are unable to confirm the presence of obstruction, requiring assessment of the upper urinary tract by antegrade pyelomanometry. This investigation measures the pressure in the upper urinary tract perfused at a constant rate by a percutaneous catheter and allows evaluation of the obstruction. The authors discuss the place of the various upper urinary tract investigations to confirm the definitive diagnosis of upper urinary tract obstruction.

Key concepts: Medicine, Upper urinary tract, Pyelogram, Urinary system, Urinary tract obstruction, Urology, Intravenous urography, Catheter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Diagnostic methods for obstruction of the upper urinary tract: which tests are available in 2001]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens