SOBRE A MORALIDADE DO DIREITO EM KANT KANT ON THE MORALITY OF LAWS
Joãosinho Beckenkamp
Abstract
Joãosinho Beckenkamp
Abstract
In present days there is a trend in writings on Kant’s practical philosophy to neglect the important distinction made in the Metaphysik der Sitten between Law (Jus) and Ethics (Ethica), so that Kant’s Doctrine of Law could be seen as a mere application of the categorical imperative. This paper aims to show that in his Doctrine of Law Kant follows a chain of arguments that establish Law as Natural Law entirely independent of Ethics.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In present days there is a trend in writings on Kant’s practical philosophy to neglect the important distinction made in the Metaphysik der Sitten between Law (Jus) and Ethics (Ethica), so that Kant’s Doctrine of Law could be seen as a mere application of the categorical imperative. This paper aims to show that in his Doctrine of Law Kant follows a chain of arguments that establish Law as Natural Law entirely independent of Ethics.
Key concepts: Categorical imperative, Doctrine, Philosophy, Kantian ethics, Morality, Natural law, Universal law, Practical philosophy