2000PubMedRequires access

Complications following combined surgery (radical vulvectomy versus wide local excision) and radiotherapy for the treatment of carcinoma of the vulva: report of 73 patients.

Özcan Balat, Cynthia Edwards, Luis Delclos

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Cancer of the vulva is uncommon, accounting for only 5% of all gynecologic malignancies, and usually occurs in women over 60 years of age. The historic treatment of choice for invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is radical vulvectomy with bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy, which has produced excellent long-term survival. We retrospectively analyzed the complications of wide local excision plus postoperative radiotherapy compared with those of radical vulvectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy plus pre-or postoperative radiotherapy in 73 patients with vulvar cancer. There were no significant differences among these treatments in terms of primary tumor control, 5-year disease-free survival, and overall survival. Based on these results, the best treatment alternative for advanced vulvar cancer is wide local excision plus radiotherapy, as this method retains the high survival of traditional therapy but has less morbidity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cancer of the vulva is uncommon, accounting for only 5% of all gynecologic malignancies, and usually occurs in women over 60 years of age. The historic treatment of choice for invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is radical vulvectomy with bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy, which has produced excellent long-term survival. We retrospectively analyzed the complications of wide local excision plus postoperative radiotherapy compared with those of radical vulvectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy plus pre-or postoperative radiotherapy in 73 patients with vulvar cancer. There were no significant differences among these treatments in terms of primary tumor control, 5-year disease-free survival, and overall survival. Based on these results, the best treatment alternative for advanced vulvar cancer is wide local excision plus radiotherapy, as this method retains the high survival of traditional therapy but has less morbidity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cancer of the vulva is uncommon, accounting for only 5% of all gynecologic malignancies, and usually occurs in women over 60 years of age. The historic treatment of choice for invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is radical vulvectomy with bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy, which has produced excellent long-term survival. We retrospectively analyzed the complications of wide local excision plus postoperative radiotherapy compared with those of radical vulvectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy plus pre-or postoperative radiotherapy in 73 patients with vulvar cancer. There were no significant differences among these treatments in terms of primary tumor control, 5-year disease-free survival, and overall survival. Based on these results, the best treatment alternative for advanced vulvar cancer is wide local excision plus radiotherapy, as this method retains the high survival of traditional therapy but has less morbidity.

Key concepts: Medicine, Radical Vulvectomy, Vulva, Vulvar cancer, Radiation therapy, Vulvectomy, Lymphadenectomy, Wide local excision

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Complications following combined surgery (radical vulvectomy versus wide local excision) and radiotherapy for the treatment of carcinoma of the vulva: report of 73 patients. — Research Paper | ScholarLens