2015•BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway))Open access

Simulation of flow around a Viking ship rudder.

Thomas Heggem

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a numerical method of solving the Navier-Stokes\nequations for all points in a grid, or mesh. By performing this operation over multiple\ntime steps, the resulting velocity and pressure field can be found. This method has been\nused to simulate the flow past a Viking ship rudder at different flow regimes.\n\nDuring sailing with a replica of the Oseberg ship, loss of steering power were experiencedwhen the ship turned to starboard. The reason for this was determined to be the rudder shape. A thicker and longer rudder was made, with the intention to customise the rudder by gradually removing the extra thickness. The rudder had better steering, but not as good as when it turned to port. Moreover, it vibrated at certain angles of attack.\n\nSeveral CFD analysis has been performed to examine what s causing the loss of lift\nand vibrations experienced by the rudder. A mesh of the fluid surrounding the rudder\nwas generated using an in-house mesh generator developed at NTNU. The rudder was\nanalysed from angles of attack α=-10 to α=10 degrees, with a 5 degree increase between\nsimulations. A validation study of NACA0012 airfoil was performed as a part of the\nproject thesis, and mesh convergence test were performed on the Oseberg rudder mesh.\nThe angles were tested at rudder rake angles of 20,25 and 30 degrees, at Reynolds number\n250, 1000 and 2.4× 10^6 . The latter corresponds to a fully developed turbulent flow, as\nsuch the k- turbulence model was used. For the results the mean drag and lift coefficient, standard deviation and the resulting moments on the free surface was determined. The flow field was then examined through vorticity, characteristics of flow separation and pressure distribution n the surface of the rudder.\n\nAt Re=1000/Re=2.4× 106 and α=-10 there was discovered a continuous vortex shedding\non the port side of the rudder. These shed vortices gave rise to a oscillating lift force, and consequently vibrations on the rudder. It was discovered that increasing the rudder rake angle proved advantageous to avoid rapid oscillations of lift, stabilising the lift coefficient as β increased. The mean lift coefficient was higher at α=-10 than at α=10 degrees, indicating that the loss of lift is not caused by vortex shedding and flow separation.\n\nA simplified model of ventilation were calculated to check the risk of air travelling along the rudder from the free surface due to suction pressure. At α=-10 the lowest point where ventilation can occur increase nearly linearly with β, whereas for positive α it is fairly constant. This indicates that the lift for negative angles are generated more by suction pressure than for positive angles. This could cause the lift loss under real conditions.\n\nTo avoid vibrations, the rudder need to be more streamlined. Smoothing the leading\nedge will cause less flow separation, and increase stability. The rudder is slightly curved inwards at the port side. Making this side straight or with a slight outward curve will also make the rudder more stable against flow separation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a numerical method of solving the Navier-Stokes\nequations for all points in a grid, or mesh. By performing this operation over multiple\ntime steps, the resulting velocity and pressure field can be found. This method has been\nused to simulate the flow past a Viking ship rudder at different flow regimes.\n\nDuring sailing with a replica of the Oseberg ship, loss of steering power were experiencedwhen the ship turned to starboard. The reason for this was determined to be the rudder shape. A thicker and longer rudder was made, with the intention to customise the rudder by gradually removing the extra thickness. The rudder had better steering, but not as good as when it turned to port. Moreover, it vibrated at certain angles of attack.\n\nSeveral CFD analysis has been performed to examine what s causing the loss of lift\nand vibrations experienced by the rudder. A mesh of the fluid surrounding the rudder\nwas generated using an in-house mesh generator developed at NTNU. The rudder was\nanalysed from angles of attack α=-10 to α=10 degrees, with a 5 degree increase between\nsimulations. A validation study of NACA0012 airfoil was performed as a part of the\nproject thesis, and mesh convergence test were performed on the Oseberg rudder mesh.\nThe angles were tested at rudder rake angles of 20,25 and 30 degrees, at Reynolds number\n250, 1000 and 2.4× 10^6 . The latter corresponds to a fully developed turbulent flow, as\nsuch the k- turbulence model was used. For the results the mean drag and lift coefficient, standard deviation and the resulting moments on the free surface was determined. The flow field was then examined through vorticity, characteristics of flow separation and pressure distribution n the surface of the rudder.\n\nAt Re=1000/Re=2.4× 106 and α=-10 there was discovered a continuous vortex shedding\non the port side of the rudder. These shed vortices gave rise to a oscillating lift force, and consequently vibrations on the rudder. It was discovered that increasing the rudder rake angle proved advantageous to avoid rapid oscillations of lift, stabilising the lift coefficient as β increased. The mean lift coefficient was higher at α=-10 than at α=10 degrees, indicating that the loss of lift is not caused by vortex shedding and flow separation.\n\nA simplified model of ventilation were calculated to check the risk of air travelling along the rudder from the free surface due to suction pressure. At α=-10 the lowest point where ventilation can occur increase nearly linearly with β, whereas for positive α it is fairly constant. This indicates that the lift for negative angles are generated more by suction pressure than for positive angles. This could cause the lift loss under real conditions.\n\nTo avoid vibrations, the rudder need to be more streamlined. Smoothing the leading\nedge will cause less flow separation, and increase stability. The rudder is slightly curved inwards at the port side. Making this side straight or with a slight outward curve will also make the rudder more stable against flow separation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a numerical method of solving the Navier-Stokes\nequations for all points in a grid, or mesh. By performing this operation over multiple\ntime steps, the resulting velocity and pressure field can be found. This method has been\nused to simulate the flow past a Viking ship rudder at different flow regimes.\n\nDuring sailing with a replica of the Oseberg ship, loss of steering power were experiencedwhen the ship turned to starboard. The reason for this was determined to be the rudder shape. A thicker and longer rudder was made, with the intention to customise the rudder by gradually removing the extra thickness. The rudder had better steering, but not as good as when it turned to port. Moreover, it vibrated at certain angles of attack.\n\nSeveral CFD analysis has been performed to examine what s causing the loss of lift\nand vibrations experienced by the rudder. A mesh of the fluid surrounding the rudder\nwas generated using an in-house mesh generator developed at NTNU. The rudder was\nanalysed from angles of attack α=-10 to α=10 degrees, with a 5 degree increase between\nsimulations. A validation study of NACA0012 airfoil was performed as a part of the\nproject thesis, and mesh convergence test were performed on the Oseberg rudder mesh.\nThe angles were tested at rudder rake angles of 20,25 and 30 degrees, at Reynolds number\n250, 1000 and 2.4× 10^6 . The latter corresponds to a fully developed turbulent flow, as\nsuch the k- turbulence model was used. For the results the mean drag and lift coefficient, standard deviation and the resulting moments on the free surface was determined. The flow field was then examined through vorticity, characteristics of flow separation and pressure distribution n the surface of the rudder.\n\nAt Re=1000/Re=2.4× 106 and α=-10 there was discovered a continuous vortex shedding\non the port side of the rudder. These shed vortices gave rise to a oscillating lift force, and consequently vibrations on the rudder. It was discovered that increasing the rudder rake angle proved advantageous to avoid rapid oscillations of lift, stabilising the lift coefficient as β increased. The mean lift coefficient was higher at α=-10 than at α=10 degrees, indicating that the loss of lift is not caused by vortex shedding and flow separation.\n\nA simplified model of ventilation were calculated to check the risk of air travelling along the rudder from the free surface due to suction pressure. At α=-10 the lowest point where ventilation can occur increase nearly linearly with β, whereas for positive α it is fairly constant. This indicates that the lift for negative angles are generated more by suction pressure than for positive angles. This could cause the lift loss under real conditions.\n\nTo avoid vibrations, the rudder need to be more streamlined. Smoothing the leading\nedge will cause less flow separation, and increase stability. The rudder is slightly curved inwards at the port side. Making this side straight or with a slight outward curve will also make the rudder more stable against flow separation.

Key concepts: Rudder, Marine engineering, Flow (mathematics), Engineering, Geology, Environmental science, Oceanography, Aeronautics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Simulation of flow around a Viking ship rudder. — Research Paper | ScholarLens