2016Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University)Open access

Ocasio v. United States: The Scope of a Conspiracy to Commit Hobbs Act Extortion

Benjamin Ludewig

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Ocasio v. United States presents the question of whether a conviction under the general federal conspiracy statute may be based on Hobbs Act extortion when a public official defendant has formed an agreement to obtain property from someone within the conspiracy. There is currently a circuit split on the question presented in Ocasio v. United States, which the Supreme Court will address. This commentary argues that the Court should allow a conviction under the general federal conspiracy statute to be based on Hobbs Act extortion when the property is obtained from someone within the conspiracy. This holding is consistent with the text of the Hobbs Act and prevents adverse policy consequences by denying an exemption for broader conspiracies.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ocasio v. United States presents the question of whether a conviction under the general federal conspiracy statute may be based on Hobbs Act extortion when a public official defendant has formed an agreement to obtain property from someone within the conspiracy. There is currently a circuit split on the question presented in Ocasio v. United States, which the Supreme Court will address. This commentary argues that the Court should allow a conviction under the general federal conspiracy statute to be based on Hobbs Act extortion when the property is obtained from someone within the conspiracy. This holding is consistent with the text of the Hobbs Act and prevents adverse policy consequences by denying an exemption for broader conspiracies.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ocasio v. United States presents the question of whether a conviction under the general federal conspiracy statute may be based on Hobbs Act extortion when a public official defendant has formed an agreement to obtain property from someone within the conspiracy. There is currently a circuit split on the question presented in Ocasio v. United States, which the Supreme Court will address. This commentary argues that the Court should allow a conviction under the general federal conspiracy statute to be based on Hobbs Act extortion when the property is obtained from someone within the conspiracy. This holding is consistent with the text of the Hobbs Act and prevents adverse policy consequences by denying an exemption for broader conspiracies.

Key concepts: Extortion, Law, Statute, Commit, Political science, Conviction, Scope (computer science), Database

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ocasio v. United States: The Scope of a Conspiracy to Commit Hobbs Act Extortion — Research Paper | ScholarLens