2010•PubMedRequires access

Comparison between the dimensions of lateral incisor crowns adjacent to unerupted palatally displaced and nondisplaced canine.

Paul Chalakkal, Abi Mathew Thomas, Saroj Chopra

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

AIM: To compare the dimensions of lateral incisor crowns adjacent to unerupted palatally displaced and nondisplaced permanent maxillary canines. METHODS: The sample consisted of 36 children between 10 and 12 years of age with unerupted maxillary canines. Each presented with a unilaterally palatally displaced (with respect to the lateral incisor) canine. The lateral incisor next to the palatally displaced canine was considered the experimental tooth; the tooth on the contralateral side was considered the control tooth. Measurements were crown width (mesiodistal), thickness (labiopalatal), taper (convergence of the crown toward the incisal edge), taper type, and crown length. RESULTS: No association was found between the experimental and control lateral incisors for crown width and thickness. However, a significant correlation was found for crown taper (P=.048) and length (P=.01). The experimental lateral incisors had a higher mean crown taper (0.54 mm) than the controls (0.24 mm). The mean crown length was smaller for the experimental lateral incisors (6.74 mm) than the control ones (7.55 mm). CONCLUSION: There is a significantly greater possibility of finding lateral incisors with greater crown taper and shorter length next to palatally displaced canines. However, there is no significant difference in crown width or thickness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To compare the dimensions of lateral incisor crowns adjacent to unerupted palatally displaced and nondisplaced permanent maxillary canines. METHODS: The sample consisted of 36 children between 10 and 12 years of age with unerupted maxillary canines. Each presented with a unilaterally palatally displaced (with respect to the lateral incisor) canine. The lateral incisor next to the palatally displaced canine was considered the experimental tooth; the tooth on the contralateral side was considered the control tooth. Measurements were crown width (mesiodistal), thickness (labiopalatal), taper (convergence of the crown toward the incisal edge), taper type, and crown length. RESULTS: No association was found between the experimental and control lateral incisors for crown width and thickness. However, a significant correlation was found for crown taper (P=.048) and length (P=.01). The experimental lateral incisors had a higher mean crown taper (0.54 mm) than the controls (0.24 mm). The mean crown length was smaller for the experimental lateral incisors (6.74 mm) than the control ones (7.55 mm). CONCLUSION: There is a significantly greater possibility of finding lateral incisors with greater crown taper and shorter length next to palatally displaced canines. However, there is no significant difference in crown width or thickness.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To compare the dimensions of lateral incisor crowns adjacent to unerupted palatally displaced and nondisplaced permanent maxillary canines. METHODS: The sample consisted of 36 children between 10 and 12 years of age with unerupted maxillary canines. Each presented with a unilaterally palatally displaced (with respect to the lateral incisor) canine. The lateral incisor next to the palatally displaced canine was considered the experimental tooth; the tooth on the contralateral side was considered the control tooth. Measurements were crown width (mesiodistal), thickness (labiopalatal), taper (convergence of the crown toward the incisal edge), taper type, and crown length. RESULTS: No association was found between the experimental and control lateral incisors for crown width and thickness. However, a significant correlation was found for crown taper (P=.048) and length (P=.01). The experimental lateral incisors had a higher mean crown taper (0.54 mm) than the controls (0.24 mm). The mean crown length was smaller for the experimental lateral incisors (6.74 mm) than the control ones (7.55 mm). CONCLUSION: There is a significantly greater possibility of finding lateral incisors with greater crown taper and shorter length next to palatally displaced canines. However, there is no significant difference in crown width or thickness.

Key concepts: Crown (dentistry), Lateral incisor, Incisor, Orthodontics, Maxillary central incisor, Dentistry, Mandibular lateral incisor, Maxillary lateral incisor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between the dimensions of lateral incisor crowns adjacent to unerupted palatally displaced and nondisplaced canine. — Research Paper | ScholarLens