1999Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Unemployment or Basic Income? — Danish Debates

Iver Hornemann Møller, Jens Lind

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Apart from the never ending discussion on how to stimulate economic growth and employment, unemployment has been the reason for three other recurrent debates in Denmark over the past 20 or so years. The first takes up unemployment benefits and the motivation of the unemployed to find employment, the second addresses how to engage the unemployed if they cannot be employed in a ‘normal’ job and the third, most prevalent during the 1970s and 1990s, turns on the merits and disadvantages of whether or not a basic income system would be the most reasonable way of dealing with the unemployment issue. It is the purpose of this essay to review the discourses on these three central issues of unemployment and public provision. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Apart from the never ending discussion on how to stimulate economic growth and employment, unemployment has been the reason for three other recurrent debates in Denmark over the past 20 or so years. The first takes up unemployment benefits and the motivation of the unemployed to find employment, the second addresses how to engage the unemployed if they cannot be employed in a ‘normal’ job and the third, most prevalent during the 1970s and 1990s, turns on the merits and disadvantages of whether or not a basic income system would be the most reasonable way of dealing with the unemployment issue. It is the purpose of this essay to review the discourses on these three central issues of unemployment and public provision. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Apart from the never ending discussion on how to stimulate economic growth and employment, unemployment has been the reason for three other recurrent debates in Denmark over the past 20 or so years. The first takes up unemployment benefits and the motivation of the unemployed to find employment, the second addresses how to engage the unemployed if they cannot be employed in a ‘normal’ job and the third, most prevalent during the 1970s and 1990s, turns on the merits and disadvantages of whether or not a basic income system would be the most reasonable way of dealing with the unemployment issue. It is the purpose of this essay to review the discourses on these three central issues of unemployment and public provision. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Unemployment, Danish, Full employment, Labour economics, Economics, Basic income, Demographic economics, Economic growth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Unemployment or Basic Income? — Danish Debates — Research Paper | ScholarLens