1991•Unpublished venueRequires access

Building Controls - Restrictive Innovative or Totally Free

Thomas Kr

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Building Regulations have often been described as restrictive to innovative design. The Building Code of Australia and State Legislation does cater for innovative design by way of an application for a variation or modification or the rules to be referred to a Board or Committee of Referees. The major detriment to innovative design is not the rules but the people that administer them. Different people have different preferences and under the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator it can be seen that there is a high probability that Local Authority Officers will be sensate and judgemental. These types have difficulty with lateral thinking and taking risks. The regulators are enforcers, not facilitators, and hide behind the rules not taking risks and reducing their liability. The future will involve legislation that allows innovative design based on objectives, however, there will always be performance specifications and deemed-to-satisfy provisions in Building Regulations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Building Regulations have often been described as restrictive to innovative design. The Building Code of Australia and State Legislation does cater for innovative design by way of an application for a variation or modification or the rules to be referred to a Board or Committee of Referees. The major detriment to innovative design is not the rules but the people that administer them. Different people have different preferences and under the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator it can be seen that there is a high probability that Local Authority Officers will be sensate and judgemental. These types have difficulty with lateral thinking and taking risks. The regulators are enforcers, not facilitators, and hide behind the rules not taking risks and reducing their liability. The future will involve legislation that allows innovative design based on objectives, however, there will always be performance specifications and deemed-to-satisfy provisions in Building Regulations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Building Regulations have often been described as restrictive to innovative design. The Building Code of Australia and State Legislation does cater for innovative design by way of an application for a variation or modification or the rules to be referred to a Board or Committee of Referees. The major detriment to innovative design is not the rules but the people that administer them. Different people have different preferences and under the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator it can be seen that there is a high probability that Local Authority Officers will be sensate and judgemental. These types have difficulty with lateral thinking and taking risks. The regulators are enforcers, not facilitators, and hide behind the rules not taking risks and reducing their liability. The future will involve legislation that allows innovative design based on objectives, however, there will always be performance specifications and deemed-to-satisfy provisions in Building Regulations.

Key concepts: Legislation, Liability, Risk analysis (engineering), Business, State (computer science), Engineering, Computer science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Building Controls - Restrictive Innovative or Totally Free — Research Paper | ScholarLens