2016Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and SocietyRequires access

Divergent cities? Unequal urban growth and development

Gregory N. Clarke, Ron Martin, Peter Tyler

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

According to Moretti (2013), deindustrialisation has been responsible for a “great divergence” between cities that have moved to become centres of innovation and ideas, and those that have continued to produce material goods. Other authors, however, place more emphasis on trends in specialisation and differences in productive bases as the driving forces behind urban divergence. Somewhat similarly, Storper (2013) argues that recent divergence has been fundamentally driven by some cities becoming more specialised in knowledge intensive sectors. While most of this interest in urban divergence has been based on US cities, recent European research also reports divergent processes. The aim of this article is to examine the degree of divergence across UK cities and to analyse how far this has been driven by differences among cities in industrial structure and specialisation, tradable bases and productivity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

According to Moretti (2013), deindustrialisation has been responsible for a “great divergence” between cities that have moved to become centres of innovation and ideas, and those that have continued to produce material goods. Other authors, however, place more emphasis on trends in specialisation and differences in productive bases as the driving forces behind urban divergence. Somewhat similarly, Storper (2013) argues that recent divergence has been fundamentally driven by some cities becoming more specialised in knowledge intensive sectors. While most of this interest in urban divergence has been based on US cities, recent European research also reports divergent processes. The aim of this article is to examine the degree of divergence across UK cities and to analyse how far this has been driven by differences among cities in industrial structure and specialisation, tradable bases and productivity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

According to Moretti (2013), deindustrialisation has been responsible for a “great divergence” between cities that have moved to become centres of innovation and ideas, and those that have continued to produce material goods. Other authors, however, place more emphasis on trends in specialisation and differences in productive bases as the driving forces behind urban divergence. Somewhat similarly, Storper (2013) argues that recent divergence has been fundamentally driven by some cities becoming more specialised in knowledge intensive sectors. While most of this interest in urban divergence has been based on US cities, recent European research also reports divergent processes. The aim of this article is to examine the degree of divergence across UK cities and to analyse how far this has been driven by differences among cities in industrial structure and specialisation, tradable bases and productivity.

Key concepts: Divergence (linguistics), Economic geography, Great Divergence, Productivity, Geography, Regional science, Economics, Economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Divergent cities? Unequal urban growth and development — Research Paper | ScholarLens