Evaluation of the Cavitron Spirometric Computer for accuracy in clinical screening spirometry.
Cissik Jh, Cramer Tj, Shelman Ll
Abstract
Cissik Jh, Cramer Tj, Shelman Ll
Abstract
Ten healthy male cardiopulmonary technicians, 10 aircrew members, and 10 patients performed a series of pulmonary function studies to compare the Cavitron Spirometric Computer to the conventional water-sealed Collins 13.5-/spirometer. A total of 50 studies were performed on the spirometers individually and then with the spirometers linked in-line. The Cavitron FVC averaged 6% less, the FEV1--7% less, and the FEF 25-75%--11.6% less than comparable measurements from the Collins spirometer. Since these difference are within the suggested guidelines for screening studies, the Cavitron Spirometric Computer is acceptable for use in clinical screening spirometry.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Ten healthy male cardiopulmonary technicians, 10 aircrew members, and 10 patients performed a series of pulmonary function studies to compare the Cavitron Spirometric Computer to the conventional water-sealed Collins 13.5-/spirometer. A total of 50 studies were performed on the spirometers individually and then with the spirometers linked in-line. The Cavitron FVC averaged 6% less, the FEV1--7% less, and the FEF 25-75%--11.6% less than comparable measurements from the Collins spirometer. Since these difference are within the suggested guidelines for screening studies, the Cavitron Spirometric Computer is acceptable for use in clinical screening spirometry.
Key concepts: Spirometer, Spirometry, Aircrew, Medicine, Physical therapy, Pulmonary function testing, Asthma, Internal medicine