1981•PubMedRequires access

Evaluation of the Cavitron Spirometric Computer for accuracy in clinical screening spirometry.

Cissik Jh, Cramer Tj, Shelman Ll

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Ten healthy male cardiopulmonary technicians, 10 aircrew members, and 10 patients performed a series of pulmonary function studies to compare the Cavitron Spirometric Computer to the conventional water-sealed Collins 13.5-/spirometer. A total of 50 studies were performed on the spirometers individually and then with the spirometers linked in-line. The Cavitron FVC averaged 6% less, the FEV1--7% less, and the FEF 25-75%--11.6% less than comparable measurements from the Collins spirometer. Since these difference are within the suggested guidelines for screening studies, the Cavitron Spirometric Computer is acceptable for use in clinical screening spirometry.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ten healthy male cardiopulmonary technicians, 10 aircrew members, and 10 patients performed a series of pulmonary function studies to compare the Cavitron Spirometric Computer to the conventional water-sealed Collins 13.5-/spirometer. A total of 50 studies were performed on the spirometers individually and then with the spirometers linked in-line. The Cavitron FVC averaged 6% less, the FEV1--7% less, and the FEF 25-75%--11.6% less than comparable measurements from the Collins spirometer. Since these difference are within the suggested guidelines for screening studies, the Cavitron Spirometric Computer is acceptable for use in clinical screening spirometry.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ten healthy male cardiopulmonary technicians, 10 aircrew members, and 10 patients performed a series of pulmonary function studies to compare the Cavitron Spirometric Computer to the conventional water-sealed Collins 13.5-/spirometer. A total of 50 studies were performed on the spirometers individually and then with the spirometers linked in-line. The Cavitron FVC averaged 6% less, the FEV1--7% less, and the FEF 25-75%--11.6% less than comparable measurements from the Collins spirometer. Since these difference are within the suggested guidelines for screening studies, the Cavitron Spirometric Computer is acceptable for use in clinical screening spirometry.

Key concepts: Spirometer, Spirometry, Aircrew, Medicine, Physical therapy, Pulmonary function testing, Asthma, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the Cavitron Spirometric Computer for accuracy in clinical screening spirometry. — Research Paper | ScholarLens