1995•PubMedRequires access

[A comparison between scleral buckling procedure and vitrectomy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachment caused by posterior retinal break].

Akinori Uemura, K Nakao

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

We reviewed conventional scleral buckling and vitrectomy for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment due to posterior retina break. A comparison was made for a consecutive series of 21 cases undergoing scleral buckling procedure and 15 cases receiving vitrectomy as the initial surgery. As regards surgical complications, in the scleral buckling procedure there was inadvertent severance or compression of the vortex veins in 16 (77%) of the 21 cases and postoperative choroidal detachment in 9 (43%). In vitrectomy, there were no remarkable intraoperative complications, but it led to progressive nuclear cataract in 10 (67%) of the 15 cases during the postoperative period. Both procedures produced successful retinal attachment with comparable visual recovery. The results indicate that vitrectomy is a useful procedure for cases of uncomplicated retinal detachment caused by deeply located retinal break.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We reviewed conventional scleral buckling and vitrectomy for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment due to posterior retina break. A comparison was made for a consecutive series of 21 cases undergoing scleral buckling procedure and 15 cases receiving vitrectomy as the initial surgery. As regards surgical complications, in the scleral buckling procedure there was inadvertent severance or compression of the vortex veins in 16 (77%) of the 21 cases and postoperative choroidal detachment in 9 (43%). In vitrectomy, there were no remarkable intraoperative complications, but it led to progressive nuclear cataract in 10 (67%) of the 15 cases during the postoperative period. Both procedures produced successful retinal attachment with comparable visual recovery. The results indicate that vitrectomy is a useful procedure for cases of uncomplicated retinal detachment caused by deeply located retinal break.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We reviewed conventional scleral buckling and vitrectomy for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment due to posterior retina break. A comparison was made for a consecutive series of 21 cases undergoing scleral buckling procedure and 15 cases receiving vitrectomy as the initial surgery. As regards surgical complications, in the scleral buckling procedure there was inadvertent severance or compression of the vortex veins in 16 (77%) of the 21 cases and postoperative choroidal detachment in 9 (43%). In vitrectomy, there were no remarkable intraoperative complications, but it led to progressive nuclear cataract in 10 (67%) of the 15 cases during the postoperative period. Both procedures produced successful retinal attachment with comparable visual recovery. The results indicate that vitrectomy is a useful procedure for cases of uncomplicated retinal detachment caused by deeply located retinal break.

Key concepts: Vitrectomy, Retinal detachment, Scleral buckling, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Retinal, Retinal Tear, Retina

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[A comparison between scleral buckling procedure and vitrectomy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachment caused by posterior retinal break]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens