1994PubMedRequires access

[Effect of nicardipine cardioplegia on A-V conduction system in coronary bypass surgery].

M Nukariya, Y Hosoda, H. Kudou, Shigeru Minami, Kenji Takazawa, M Gotou, Tatsuo Satoh, Noriko Kikuchi, Motonobu Watanabe, Masayuki Tahara

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The effect of diltiazem and nicardipine cardioplegia on A-V conduction system was analyzed in 75 patients undergoing coronary bypass operation. The dose of these drugs into the crystalloid cardioplegia was 10 micrograms/kg in nicardipine group (n = 29) and 100 micrograms/kg in diltiazem group (n = 46). Among these patients, there was no operative death and no patient required IABP after surgery and there was no difference on the post operative CK-MB level, on the cardiac index and on the pulmonary pressure between two groups. The number of patients who had complete A-V block after release of aortic cross clamping was significantly smaller in nicardipine group than in diltiazem group: 45.7% in diltiazem group vs. 6.9% in nicardipine group at 30 minutes and 21.7% vs. 6.9% at 60 minutes. We conclude that the suppressive effect on A-V conduction system was significantly lower in nicardipine cardioplegia than in diltiazem cardioplegia in the patients undergoing coronary bypass operation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effect of diltiazem and nicardipine cardioplegia on A-V conduction system was analyzed in 75 patients undergoing coronary bypass operation. The dose of these drugs into the crystalloid cardioplegia was 10 micrograms/kg in nicardipine group (n = 29) and 100 micrograms/kg in diltiazem group (n = 46). Among these patients, there was no operative death and no patient required IABP after surgery and there was no difference on the post operative CK-MB level, on the cardiac index and on the pulmonary pressure between two groups. The number of patients who had complete A-V block after release of aortic cross clamping was significantly smaller in nicardipine group than in diltiazem group: 45.7% in diltiazem group vs. 6.9% in nicardipine group at 30 minutes and 21.7% vs. 6.9% at 60 minutes. We conclude that the suppressive effect on A-V conduction system was significantly lower in nicardipine cardioplegia than in diltiazem cardioplegia in the patients undergoing coronary bypass operation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effect of diltiazem and nicardipine cardioplegia on A-V conduction system was analyzed in 75 patients undergoing coronary bypass operation. The dose of these drugs into the crystalloid cardioplegia was 10 micrograms/kg in nicardipine group (n = 29) and 100 micrograms/kg in diltiazem group (n = 46). Among these patients, there was no operative death and no patient required IABP after surgery and there was no difference on the post operative CK-MB level, on the cardiac index and on the pulmonary pressure between two groups. The number of patients who had complete A-V block after release of aortic cross clamping was significantly smaller in nicardipine group than in diltiazem group: 45.7% in diltiazem group vs. 6.9% in nicardipine group at 30 minutes and 21.7% vs. 6.9% at 60 minutes. We conclude that the suppressive effect on A-V conduction system was significantly lower in nicardipine cardioplegia than in diltiazem cardioplegia in the patients undergoing coronary bypass operation.

Key concepts: Nicardipine, Diltiazem, Medicine, Anesthesia, Cardiology, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Cardiac index, Bypass surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Effect of nicardipine cardioplegia on A-V conduction system in coronary bypass surgery]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens