2010•PubMedRequires access

[Immunoadsorption in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients].

Wei Wang, Liu H, Hang YIN, Li Xb, Yang Xy, Li Ren, Hu Xp, Y Wang, Zhang Xd

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to investigate the efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption (IA) therapy in the prevention of highly sensitized renal transplant recipients with acute rejection. METHODS: a retrospective analysis of preoperative clinical data was carried out in 12 renal transplant patients in our hospital from March 2008 to October 2009 with a high level of panel reactive antibody (PRA). Serum PRA and IgG, IgM, IgA were detected at pre and post-treatment. The acute rejection responses and adverse effects were observed. RESULTS: at post-treatment, PRA of both Class I and II antibody [14% (4%, 27%) vs 86% (73%, 98%), 6% (0, 23%) vs 68% (34%, 88%), P < 0.01] and serum total IgG levels significantly decreased [(550 ± 341) g/L vs (1301 ± 393) g/L, P < 0.01]. IgA and IgM were also lower than those at pre-treatment [(144 ± 78) g/L vs (185 ± 93) g/L, (103 ± 48) g/L vs (131 ± 66) g/L, P < 0.01]. Five cases had acute rejection reversible by anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or combined IA (n = 2). Within 6 months, 1 cases developed Aspergillus pneumonia, 2 cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia were cured. CONCLUSION: IA therapy can reduce antibody levels in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients. When supplemented with induction therapy, it can effectively prevent and reduce rejection after renal transplantation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: to investigate the efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption (IA) therapy in the prevention of highly sensitized renal transplant recipients with acute rejection. METHODS: a retrospective analysis of preoperative clinical data was carried out in 12 renal transplant patients in our hospital from March 2008 to October 2009 with a high level of panel reactive antibody (PRA). Serum PRA and IgG, IgM, IgA were detected at pre and post-treatment. The acute rejection responses and adverse effects were observed. RESULTS: at post-treatment, PRA of both Class I and II antibody [14% (4%, 27%) vs 86% (73%, 98%), 6% (0, 23%) vs 68% (34%, 88%), P < 0.01] and serum total IgG levels significantly decreased [(550 ± 341) g/L vs (1301 ± 393) g/L, P < 0.01]. IgA and IgM were also lower than those at pre-treatment [(144 ± 78) g/L vs (185 ± 93) g/L, (103 ± 48) g/L vs (131 ± 66) g/L, P < 0.01]. Five cases had acute rejection reversible by anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or combined IA (n = 2). Within 6 months, 1 cases developed Aspergillus pneumonia, 2 cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia were cured. CONCLUSION: IA therapy can reduce antibody levels in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients. When supplemented with induction therapy, it can effectively prevent and reduce rejection after renal transplantation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: to investigate the efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption (IA) therapy in the prevention of highly sensitized renal transplant recipients with acute rejection. METHODS: a retrospective analysis of preoperative clinical data was carried out in 12 renal transplant patients in our hospital from March 2008 to October 2009 with a high level of panel reactive antibody (PRA). Serum PRA and IgG, IgM, IgA were detected at pre and post-treatment. The acute rejection responses and adverse effects were observed. RESULTS: at post-treatment, PRA of both Class I and II antibody [14% (4%, 27%) vs 86% (73%, 98%), 6% (0, 23%) vs 68% (34%, 88%), P < 0.01] and serum total IgG levels significantly decreased [(550 ± 341) g/L vs (1301 ± 393) g/L, P < 0.01]. IgA and IgM were also lower than those at pre-treatment [(144 ± 78) g/L vs (185 ± 93) g/L, (103 ± 48) g/L vs (131 ± 66) g/L, P < 0.01]. Five cases had acute rejection reversible by anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or combined IA (n = 2). Within 6 months, 1 cases developed Aspergillus pneumonia, 2 cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia were cured. CONCLUSION: IA therapy can reduce antibody levels in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients. When supplemented with induction therapy, it can effectively prevent and reduce rejection after renal transplantation.

Key concepts: Medicine, Immunoadsorption, Panel reactive antibody, Pneumocystis carinii, Gastroenterology, Kidney transplantation, Internal medicine, Antibody

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Immunoadsorption in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens