Benefits To Non Engineers Of Learning An Engineering Way Of Thinking
Kevin Anderson, Christine G. Nicometo, Sandra Courter, Thomas McGlamery, Traci Nathans-Kelly
Abstract
Open-access reader
Kevin Anderson, Christine G. Nicometo, Sandra Courter, Thomas McGlamery, Traci Nathans-Kelly
Abstract
Open-access reader
In this study we seek to describe the benefits of an engineering way of thinking, as gained through an engineering degree program, for individuals who choose non-engineering careers.There is limited literature on this topic.Arguably, this understanding should influence the future of engineering education as fewer than half of engineering graduates remain in "traditional" engineering roles.We surveyed individuals with engineering degrees, but who described themselves as not being an engineer or in an engineering management role (n=112).We also interviewed a few such individuals (n=7).We found that the majority of these individuals still considered themselves engineers, even with a different career focus; it was part of their identity.Most of the respondents who did not consider themselves engineers still greatly valued their engineering training.These individuals described how the systematic and analytical thinking of engineering applied to solving problems in their current work contexts.They also found practical value in their technical competence.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this study we seek to describe the benefits of an engineering way of thinking, as gained through an engineering degree program, for individuals who choose non-engineering careers.There is limited literature on this topic.Arguably, this understanding should influence the future of engineering education as fewer than half of engineering graduates remain in "traditional" engineering roles.We surveyed individuals with engineering degrees, but who described themselves as not being an engineer or in an engineering management role (n=112).We also interviewed a few such individuals (n=7).We found that the majority of these individuals still considered themselves engineers, even with a different career focus; it was part of their identity.Most of the respondents who did not consider themselves engineers still greatly valued their engineering training.These individuals described how the systematic and analytical thinking of engineering applied to solving problems in their current work contexts.They also found practical value in their technical competence.
Key concepts: Engineering education, Competence (human resources), Health systems engineering, Value (mathematics), Applied engineering, Biological systems engineering, Civil engineering software, Identity (music)