1997•Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre)Open access

On the Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Some have Sentences

Dubravko Kučanda

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic status of have sentences with the general structure given in (1), and exemplified by (2) and (3) : (1) NP 1 - have - NP 2 - V n on-finite (2) I have two buttons missing on my jacket. (3) My friend had a valuable watch stolen. The syntactic evidence adduced in the paper shows that the NP 2 - V n on-finite part of the sentence does not instantiate complex-transitive complementation by an object and an -ing participle or -ed participle complement, as is argued by Quirk et al. (1985:1206ff). The postverbal part in (1) is shown to constitute a single argument of the verb have with NP 2 as a semantic argument of the non finite verb, i.e. have is described as a two-place predicate with an Experiencer and the Content of Experience in its semantic predicate frame. Pragmatically, this sentence type enables the speaker to empathize with the referent of NP 1 and to present the state of affairs expressed by the NP 2 - V n on-finite part from the point of view of that referent. This paper also argues against the traditional view that such have sentences are derived from constructions with a possessive determiner and that they primarily express possession

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper discusses the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic status of have sentences with the general structure given in (1), and exemplified by (2) and (3) : (1) NP 1 - have - NP 2 - V n on-finite (2) I have two buttons missing on my jacket. (3) My friend had a valuable watch stolen. The syntactic evidence adduced in the paper shows that the NP 2 - V n on-finite part of the sentence does not instantiate complex-transitive complementation by an object and an -ing participle or -ed participle complement, as is argued by Quirk et al. (1985:1206ff). The postverbal part in (1) is shown to constitute a single argument of the verb have with NP 2 as a semantic argument of the non finite verb, i.e. have is described as a two-place predicate with an Experiencer and the Content of Experience in its semantic predicate frame. Pragmatically, this sentence type enables the speaker to empathize with the referent of NP 1 and to present the state of affairs expressed by the NP 2 - V n on-finite part from the point of view of that referent. This paper also argues against the traditional view that such have sentences are derived from constructions with a possessive determiner and that they primarily express possession

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper discusses the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic status of have sentences with the general structure given in (1), and exemplified by (2) and (3) : (1) NP 1 - have - NP 2 - V n on-finite (2) I have two buttons missing on my jacket. (3) My friend had a valuable watch stolen. The syntactic evidence adduced in the paper shows that the NP 2 - V n on-finite part of the sentence does not instantiate complex-transitive complementation by an object and an -ing participle or -ed participle complement, as is argued by Quirk et al. (1985:1206ff). The postverbal part in (1) is shown to constitute a single argument of the verb have with NP 2 as a semantic argument of the non finite verb, i.e. have is described as a two-place predicate with an Experiencer and the Content of Experience in its semantic predicate frame. Pragmatically, this sentence type enables the speaker to empathize with the referent of NP 1 and to present the state of affairs expressed by the NP 2 - V n on-finite part from the point of view of that referent. This paper also argues against the traditional view that such have sentences are derived from constructions with a possessive determiner and that they primarily express possession

Key concepts: Participle, Linguistics, Predicate (mathematical logic), Transitive relation, Referent, Verb, Sentence, Pragmatics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Some have Sentences — Research Paper | ScholarLens