2016•Journal of Chemical Technology & BiotechnologyRequires access

Influence of powdered and granular activated carbon system as a pre‐treatment alternative for membrane filtration of produced water

Börte Köse‐Mutlu, Mustafa Evren Erşahin, Hale Özgün, Recep Kaya, Cumali Kınacı, İsmail Koyuncu

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Membrane technology is used for the treatment of produced water enabling high permeate quality to meet discharge standards or potable and irrigation water quality standards. In this study, the effect of hybrid membrane‐activated carbon processes on the performance of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membrane systems treating mixed oil and gas field produced water was investigated. Different pre‐treatment alternatives including combinations of microfiltration unit and powdered activated carbon (PAC) or granular activated carbon (GAC) systems were applied prior to nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes. RESULTS The activated carbon process increased chemical oxygen demand (COD) and conductivity removal efficiencies due to the organic matter and ion adsorption capacity of activated carbon. PAC addition gave the best removal efficiencies for COD, whereas highest conductivity removals were obtained in studies with GAC addition. CONCLUSION Differences obtained in the performance of different pre‐treatment alternatives based on targeted pollutants and membrane characteristics confirmed synergetic/antagonistic effects between pre‐ and final membrane treatment. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract BACKGROUND Membrane technology is used for the treatment of produced water enabling high permeate quality to meet discharge standards or potable and irrigation water quality standards. In this study, the effect of hybrid membrane‐activated carbon processes on the performance of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membrane systems treating mixed oil and gas field produced water was investigated. Different pre‐treatment alternatives including combinations of microfiltration unit and powdered activated carbon (PAC) or granular activated carbon (GAC) systems were applied prior to nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes. RESULTS The activated carbon process increased chemical oxygen demand (COD) and conductivity removal efficiencies due to the organic matter and ion adsorption capacity of activated carbon. PAC addition gave the best removal efficiencies for COD, whereas highest conductivity removals were obtained in studies with GAC addition. CONCLUSION Differences obtained in the performance of different pre‐treatment alternatives based on targeted pollutants and membrane characteristics confirmed synergetic/antagonistic effects between pre‐ and final membrane treatment. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Membrane technology is used for the treatment of produced water enabling high permeate quality to meet discharge standards or potable and irrigation water quality standards. In this study, the effect of hybrid membrane‐activated carbon processes on the performance of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membrane systems treating mixed oil and gas field produced water was investigated. Different pre‐treatment alternatives including combinations of microfiltration unit and powdered activated carbon (PAC) or granular activated carbon (GAC) systems were applied prior to nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes. RESULTS The activated carbon process increased chemical oxygen demand (COD) and conductivity removal efficiencies due to the organic matter and ion adsorption capacity of activated carbon. PAC addition gave the best removal efficiencies for COD, whereas highest conductivity removals were obtained in studies with GAC addition. CONCLUSION Differences obtained in the performance of different pre‐treatment alternatives based on targeted pollutants and membrane characteristics confirmed synergetic/antagonistic effects between pre‐ and final membrane treatment. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

Key concepts: Nanofiltration, Reverse osmosis, Activated carbon, Powdered activated carbon treatment, Membrane, Filtration (mathematics), Chemistry, Microfiltration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of powdered and granular activated carbon system as a pre‐treatment alternative for membrane filtration of produced water — Research Paper | ScholarLens