2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Grammaticalization of Quasi-Modal Auxiliaries

Su Jin Eom

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to offer a new account of English quasi-modal auxiliaries, be going to and have to from a grammaticalization perspective. This paper provides an overview of the theory of grammaticalization, including its characteristics, important mechanisms, and its three tentative stages. Grammaticalization is a process that creates new grammatical categories, usually involving a full lexical word that eventually changes into a grammatical function, and a less grammatical meaning that gradually changes into a more grammatical meaning. Bemuse of the complexity of the semantic changes that occur during grammaticalization, no single mechanism can be used to explain all phenomena and therefore a range of mechanisms is proposed. These include metaphor, inference, generalization, semantic bleaching, metonymy, subjectification, analogy and reanalysis. Many of these mechanisms are simultaneously related to the grammaticalization of be going to and have to. By studying the pathways and mechanisms of the grammaticalization process of these words, we can gain a more cogent explanation as to why quasi-modal auxiliaries take their present form and meaning. The application of grammaticalization theory in a comparative analysis of be going to vs. will and have to vs. must, enables us to see the respective similarities and differences in form and function of quasi-modal auxiliaries versus modal auxiliaries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The goal of this paper is to offer a new account of English quasi-modal auxiliaries, be going to and have to from a grammaticalization perspective. This paper provides an overview of the theory of grammaticalization, including its characteristics, important mechanisms, and its three tentative stages. Grammaticalization is a process that creates new grammatical categories, usually involving a full lexical word that eventually changes into a grammatical function, and a less grammatical meaning that gradually changes into a more grammatical meaning. Bemuse of the complexity of the semantic changes that occur during grammaticalization, no single mechanism can be used to explain all phenomena and therefore a range of mechanisms is proposed. These include metaphor, inference, generalization, semantic bleaching, metonymy, subjectification, analogy and reanalysis. Many of these mechanisms are simultaneously related to the grammaticalization of be going to and have to. By studying the pathways and mechanisms of the grammaticalization process of these words, we can gain a more cogent explanation as to why quasi-modal auxiliaries take their present form and meaning. The application of grammaticalization theory in a comparative analysis of be going to vs. will and have to vs. must, enables us to see the respective similarities and differences in form and function of quasi-modal auxiliaries versus modal auxiliaries.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The goal of this paper is to offer a new account of English quasi-modal auxiliaries, be going to and have to from a grammaticalization perspective. This paper provides an overview of the theory of grammaticalization, including its characteristics, important mechanisms, and its three tentative stages. Grammaticalization is a process that creates new grammatical categories, usually involving a full lexical word that eventually changes into a grammatical function, and a less grammatical meaning that gradually changes into a more grammatical meaning. Bemuse of the complexity of the semantic changes that occur during grammaticalization, no single mechanism can be used to explain all phenomena and therefore a range of mechanisms is proposed. These include metaphor, inference, generalization, semantic bleaching, metonymy, subjectification, analogy and reanalysis. Many of these mechanisms are simultaneously related to the grammaticalization of be going to and have to. By studying the pathways and mechanisms of the grammaticalization process of these words, we can gain a more cogent explanation as to why quasi-modal auxiliaries take their present form and meaning. The application of grammaticalization theory in a comparative analysis of be going to vs. will and have to vs. must, enables us to see the respective similarities and differences in form and function of quasi-modal auxiliaries versus modal auxiliaries.

Key concepts: Grammaticalization, Linguistics, Subjectification, Metonymy, Meaning (existential), Metaphor, Analogy, Modal verb

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Grammaticalization of Quasi-Modal Auxiliaries — Research Paper | ScholarLens