1976•Southern Medical JournalRequires access

Clinical Comparison of Isoflurane and Halothane Anesthetics*

Prithvi P. Raj, MARTHA J. TOD, M. T. JENKINS

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Isoflurane and halothane were compared in two similar groups of 100 patients each. Isoflurane compared favorably with halothane in producing adequate anesthesia in all our patients. Induction period was a little stormy when there was direct induction with isoflurane. Maintenance was excellent and recovery was good. Mean concentration necessary to induce anesthesia was 3.07% with isoflurane and 2.56% with halothane. Mean maintenance with isoflurane was 1.39%, compared to 1.40% with halothane. Less curare was required for relaxation when used with isoflurane than with halothane. This difference was not seen with pancuronium (Pavulon). Patient recovery was faster with isoflurane than with halothane. Incidence of delirium and shivering in the recovery period was similar for both agents. Incidence of nausea and vomiting was greater with isoflurane. Other clinical and biochemical postoperative comparisons did not show any significant differences between the two agents.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Isoflurane and halothane were compared in two similar groups of 100 patients each. Isoflurane compared favorably with halothane in producing adequate anesthesia in all our patients. Induction period was a little stormy when there was direct induction with isoflurane. Maintenance was excellent and recovery was good. Mean concentration necessary to induce anesthesia was 3.07% with isoflurane and 2.56% with halothane. Mean maintenance with isoflurane was 1.39%, compared to 1.40% with halothane. Less curare was required for relaxation when used with isoflurane than with halothane. This difference was not seen with pancuronium (Pavulon). Patient recovery was faster with isoflurane than with halothane. Incidence of delirium and shivering in the recovery period was similar for both agents. Incidence of nausea and vomiting was greater with isoflurane. Other clinical and biochemical postoperative comparisons did not show any significant differences between the two agents.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Isoflurane and halothane were compared in two similar groups of 100 patients each. Isoflurane compared favorably with halothane in producing adequate anesthesia in all our patients. Induction period was a little stormy when there was direct induction with isoflurane. Maintenance was excellent and recovery was good. Mean concentration necessary to induce anesthesia was 3.07% with isoflurane and 2.56% with halothane. Mean maintenance with isoflurane was 1.39%, compared to 1.40% with halothane. Less curare was required for relaxation when used with isoflurane than with halothane. This difference was not seen with pancuronium (Pavulon). Patient recovery was faster with isoflurane than with halothane. Incidence of delirium and shivering in the recovery period was similar for both agents. Incidence of nausea and vomiting was greater with isoflurane. Other clinical and biochemical postoperative comparisons did not show any significant differences between the two agents.

Key concepts: Isoflurane, Halothane, Medicine, Anesthesia, Shivering, Vomiting, Emergence delirium, Nausea

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Comparison of Isoflurane and Halothane Anesthetics* — Research Paper | ScholarLens