2016Dental Press Journal of OrthodonticsOpen access

Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants

Juliana Volpato Curi Paccini, Flávio Augusto Cotrim-Ferreira, Flávio Vellini Ferreira, Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas, Rodrigo Hermont Cançado, Fabrício Pinelli Valarelli

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with two or three mini-implants. METHODS: Twenty five maxillary first molars extruded for loss of their antagonists in adult subjects were selected. The sample was divided into two groups, according to the intrusion protocol with two or three mini-implants. Group 1 consisted of 15 molars that were intruded by two mini-implants. Group 2 consisted of 10 molars intruded by three mini-implants. Changes with treatment were analyzed in lateral cephalograms at the beginning and at the end of intrusion of maxillary molars. RESULTS: Results showed that there was no difference in efficiency for the two intrusion protocols. It was concluded that extruded maxillary molars can be intruded with two or three mini-implants with similar efficiency.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with two or three mini-implants. METHODS: Twenty five maxillary first molars extruded for loss of their antagonists in adult subjects were selected. The sample was divided into two groups, according to the intrusion protocol with two or three mini-implants. Group 1 consisted of 15 molars that were intruded by two mini-implants. Group 2 consisted of 10 molars intruded by three mini-implants. Changes with treatment were analyzed in lateral cephalograms at the beginning and at the end of intrusion of maxillary molars. RESULTS: Results showed that there was no difference in efficiency for the two intrusion protocols. It was concluded that extruded maxillary molars can be intruded with two or three mini-implants with similar efficiency.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with two or three mini-implants. METHODS: Twenty five maxillary first molars extruded for loss of their antagonists in adult subjects were selected. The sample was divided into two groups, according to the intrusion protocol with two or three mini-implants. Group 1 consisted of 15 molars that were intruded by two mini-implants. Group 2 consisted of 10 molars intruded by three mini-implants. Changes with treatment were analyzed in lateral cephalograms at the beginning and at the end of intrusion of maxillary molars. RESULTS: Results showed that there was no difference in efficiency for the two intrusion protocols. It was concluded that extruded maxillary molars can be intruded with two or three mini-implants with similar efficiency.

Key concepts: Molar, Intrusion, Dentistry, Maxillary molar, Orthodontics, Medicine, Significant difference, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants — Research Paper | ScholarLens