The Object Dimension: Assumptions
Walter Benesch
Abstract
Walter Benesch
Abstract
This pair of children’s poems expresses two intuitive ideas implicit in the object dimension of philosophical space. The first verse, which many of us as children were urged to chant back at tormentors, asserts that sticks and stones as material objects have mass, whereas mere names do not and therefore cannot physically injure us. The second poem expresses the idea that objects occupy space and that two different objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time. For centuries these two ideas have defined the real, as having mass and occupying space. ‘Whenever there is the body, there is the ākāśa [space/ether]. The body becomes related to the ākāśa because the latter gives room to the former.’2
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This pair of children’s poems expresses two intuitive ideas implicit in the object dimension of philosophical space. The first verse, which many of us as children were urged to chant back at tormentors, asserts that sticks and stones as material objects have mass, whereas mere names do not and therefore cannot physically injure us. The second poem expresses the idea that objects occupy space and that two different objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time. For centuries these two ideas have defined the real, as having mass and occupying space. ‘Whenever there is the body, there is the ākāśa [space/ether]. The body becomes related to the ākāśa because the latter gives room to the former.’2
Key concepts: Object (grammar), Space (punctuation), Dimension (graph theory), Poetry, Philosophy, Epistemology, Pure mathematics, Mathematics