1983•PubMedRequires access

Non-invasive laboratory diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.

Shekeeb Sufian, Toshimasa Matsumoto

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Both legs of 52 patients, in whom deep thrombosis was clinically suspected in one leg, were investigated. Out of the 52 legs used as a control, without suspected deep venous thrombosis, two were found to have deep venous thrombosis. Laboratory findings revealed that deep venous thrombosis was not present in 25% of the cases suspected. The patients in this group did not require venogram and were not treated. Nineteen suspected legs (36.5%) were proved negative not only by the laboratory method but also by venography.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Both legs of 52 patients, in whom deep thrombosis was clinically suspected in one leg, were investigated. Out of the 52 legs used as a control, without suspected deep venous thrombosis, two were found to have deep venous thrombosis. Laboratory findings revealed that deep venous thrombosis was not present in 25% of the cases suspected. The patients in this group did not require venogram and were not treated. Nineteen suspected legs (36.5%) were proved negative not only by the laboratory method but also by venography.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Both legs of 52 patients, in whom deep thrombosis was clinically suspected in one leg, were investigated. Out of the 52 legs used as a control, without suspected deep venous thrombosis, two were found to have deep venous thrombosis. Laboratory findings revealed that deep venous thrombosis was not present in 25% of the cases suspected. The patients in this group did not require venogram and were not treated. Nineteen suspected legs (36.5%) were proved negative not only by the laboratory method but also by venography.

Key concepts: Medicine, Venography, Venous thrombosis, Thrombosis, Deep vein, Radiology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-invasive laboratory diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens