1989PubMedRequires access

Sensitivity of crude and purified Fasciola antigens in immunological diagnosis of human fascioliasis.

H. M. Khalil, T. M. Abdel-aal, M K Makled, H M Abdalla, I A Fahmy, Eman El-Zayat

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

A study has been done to find the effect of purification of crude antigens, extracted from adult Fasciola gigantica and Fasciola hepatica worms on the sensitivity of some serological techniques in diagnosis of fascioliasis. Using C.I.E.P. test, the partially purified antigens of both Fasciola species were less sensitive than their corresponding crude ones. Using I.H.A., the difference between results of crude and partially purified antigens for the two species were statistically insignificant, both (P greater than 0.05). So in applying this test, there is no need for the partially purification of antigen. On using E.L.I.S.A. the partially purified antigens showed higher sensitivities for detection of fascioliasis than their corresponding crude ones. Partially purified F. gigantica and F. hepatica antigens gave nearly the same results whether using C.I.E.P., I.H.A. or E.L.I.S.A. However, E.L.I.S.A. was the most sensitive technique followed by I.H.A. then C.I.E.P.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A study has been done to find the effect of purification of crude antigens, extracted from adult Fasciola gigantica and Fasciola hepatica worms on the sensitivity of some serological techniques in diagnosis of fascioliasis. Using C.I.E.P. test, the partially purified antigens of both Fasciola species were less sensitive than their corresponding crude ones. Using I.H.A., the difference between results of crude and partially purified antigens for the two species were statistically insignificant, both (P greater than 0.05). So in applying this test, there is no need for the partially purification of antigen. On using E.L.I.S.A. the partially purified antigens showed higher sensitivities for detection of fascioliasis than their corresponding crude ones. Partially purified F. gigantica and F. hepatica antigens gave nearly the same results whether using C.I.E.P., I.H.A. or E.L.I.S.A. However, E.L.I.S.A. was the most sensitive technique followed by I.H.A. then C.I.E.P.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A study has been done to find the effect of purification of crude antigens, extracted from adult Fasciola gigantica and Fasciola hepatica worms on the sensitivity of some serological techniques in diagnosis of fascioliasis. Using C.I.E.P. test, the partially purified antigens of both Fasciola species were less sensitive than their corresponding crude ones. Using I.H.A., the difference between results of crude and partially purified antigens for the two species were statistically insignificant, both (P greater than 0.05). So in applying this test, there is no need for the partially purification of antigen. On using E.L.I.S.A. the partially purified antigens showed higher sensitivities for detection of fascioliasis than their corresponding crude ones. Partially purified F. gigantica and F. hepatica antigens gave nearly the same results whether using C.I.E.P., I.H.A. or E.L.I.S.A. However, E.L.I.S.A. was the most sensitive technique followed by I.H.A. then C.I.E.P.

Key concepts: Fasciola gigantica, Hepatica, Fasciola hepatica, Antigen, Fasciola, Serology, Fasciolosis, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sensitivity of crude and purified Fasciola antigens in immunological diagnosis of human fascioliasis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens