1986The Journal of UrologyRequires access

The Unreliability of Nocturnal Penile Tumescence Recording as an Outcome Measurement in the Treatment of Organic Impotence

Michael Condra, Álvaro Morales, David Surridge, James A. Owen, Peter G. Marshall, Janet Fenemore

Open publisher page 46 citations

Abstract

We investigated the degree of congruence between outcome measures used to evaluate pharmacological treatment of impotence. After a comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment 17 patients were treated with an adrenergic blocker during an 8-week interval. Nocturnal penile tumescence recordings were made before treatment (as part of the assessment procedure) and at its conclusion. As part of a larger study the use of nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring has been examined as a possible outcome measure. Patient and partner self-reports also were used to evaluate treatment outcome. A comparison of patient and partner self-reports with nocturnal penile tumescence records showed little agreement between the 2 measures. These findings suggest that despite its intuitive appeal as an index of erectile function nocturnal penile tumescence recording is not a reliable index of therapeutic effectiveness. Furthermore, these findings lend support to the hypothesis that nocturnal penile tumescence and sexual erections may be separate phenomena, perhaps under the control of different mechanisms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We investigated the degree of congruence between outcome measures used to evaluate pharmacological treatment of impotence. After a comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment 17 patients were treated with an adrenergic blocker during an 8-week interval. Nocturnal penile tumescence recordings were made before treatment (as part of the assessment procedure) and at its conclusion. As part of a larger study the use of nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring has been examined as a possible outcome measure. Patient and partner self-reports also were used to evaluate treatment outcome. A comparison of patient and partner self-reports with nocturnal penile tumescence records showed little agreement between the 2 measures. These findings suggest that despite its intuitive appeal as an index of erectile function nocturnal penile tumescence recording is not a reliable index of therapeutic effectiveness. Furthermore, these findings lend support to the hypothesis that nocturnal penile tumescence and sexual erections may be separate phenomena, perhaps under the control of different mechanisms.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We investigated the degree of congruence between outcome measures used to evaluate pharmacological treatment of impotence. After a comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment 17 patients were treated with an adrenergic blocker during an 8-week interval. Nocturnal penile tumescence recordings were made before treatment (as part of the assessment procedure) and at its conclusion. As part of a larger study the use of nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring has been examined as a possible outcome measure. Patient and partner self-reports also were used to evaluate treatment outcome. A comparison of patient and partner self-reports with nocturnal penile tumescence records showed little agreement between the 2 measures. These findings suggest that despite its intuitive appeal as an index of erectile function nocturnal penile tumescence recording is not a reliable index of therapeutic effectiveness. Furthermore, these findings lend support to the hypothesis that nocturnal penile tumescence and sexual erections may be separate phenomena, perhaps under the control of different mechanisms.

Key concepts: Nocturnal penile tumescence, Tumescence, Medicine, Nocturnal, Erectile function, Erectile dysfunction, Surgery, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Unreliability of Nocturnal Penile Tumescence Recording as an Outcome Measurement in the Treatment of Organic Impotence — Research Paper | ScholarLens