2011•PubMedRequires access

Studying the expansion of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: is there a role for peak wall stress?

Efstratios I. Georgakarakos, Christos V. Ioannou, Yannis Papaharilaou, Theodoros I. Kostas, G Kozyrakis, A. N. Katsamouris

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this paper was to study the characteristics of three distending small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), with an increase in maximal diameter from 5 to 5.5 cm or above. METHODS: Peak Wall Stress (PWS) in the presence and absence of intraluminal thrombus (ILT) was evaluated in 3 cases of small AAAs (5 cm), at initial presentation and after their expansion, at maximum diameters ≥5.5 cm using finite element analysis. Furthermore, AAA sac volume (Vsac), the percentage volume of ILT (ILT%) and the percentage change of Vsac (ΔV%) and ILT (ILT%) were estimated and the location of PWS was recorded. RESULTS: Two AAA expanded from 5cm to 5.5 cm in a period of 6 months after initial presentation, with increase of sac volume by 20% and 30%, respectively. The third AAA expanded to a diameter of 6.5 cm after a follow-up period of 13 months, with a subsequent increase in sac volume of 78%. The expansion of AAA max diameter did not correlate with differences in peak wall stress (PWS) values at the initial presentation, ranging from 20.5 to 21.3 Nt/cm2. CONCLUSION: PWS values cannot solely serve as a predictive tool for small AAA expansion. Small AAA expansion seem to be a multifactorial process, not solely described by PWS values but rather by a combination of mechanical, hemodynamic and biological factors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: The aim of this paper was to study the characteristics of three distending small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), with an increase in maximal diameter from 5 to 5.5 cm or above. METHODS: Peak Wall Stress (PWS) in the presence and absence of intraluminal thrombus (ILT) was evaluated in 3 cases of small AAAs (5 cm), at initial presentation and after their expansion, at maximum diameters ≥5.5 cm using finite element analysis. Furthermore, AAA sac volume (Vsac), the percentage volume of ILT (ILT%) and the percentage change of Vsac (ΔV%) and ILT (ILT%) were estimated and the location of PWS was recorded. RESULTS: Two AAA expanded from 5cm to 5.5 cm in a period of 6 months after initial presentation, with increase of sac volume by 20% and 30%, respectively. The third AAA expanded to a diameter of 6.5 cm after a follow-up period of 13 months, with a subsequent increase in sac volume of 78%. The expansion of AAA max diameter did not correlate with differences in peak wall stress (PWS) values at the initial presentation, ranging from 20.5 to 21.3 Nt/cm2. CONCLUSION: PWS values cannot solely serve as a predictive tool for small AAA expansion. Small AAA expansion seem to be a multifactorial process, not solely described by PWS values but rather by a combination of mechanical, hemodynamic and biological factors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: The aim of this paper was to study the characteristics of three distending small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), with an increase in maximal diameter from 5 to 5.5 cm or above. METHODS: Peak Wall Stress (PWS) in the presence and absence of intraluminal thrombus (ILT) was evaluated in 3 cases of small AAAs (5 cm), at initial presentation and after their expansion, at maximum diameters ≥5.5 cm using finite element analysis. Furthermore, AAA sac volume (Vsac), the percentage volume of ILT (ILT%) and the percentage change of Vsac (ΔV%) and ILT (ILT%) were estimated and the location of PWS was recorded. RESULTS: Two AAA expanded from 5cm to 5.5 cm in a period of 6 months after initial presentation, with increase of sac volume by 20% and 30%, respectively. The third AAA expanded to a diameter of 6.5 cm after a follow-up period of 13 months, with a subsequent increase in sac volume of 78%. The expansion of AAA max diameter did not correlate with differences in peak wall stress (PWS) values at the initial presentation, ranging from 20.5 to 21.3 Nt/cm2. CONCLUSION: PWS values cannot solely serve as a predictive tool for small AAA expansion. Small AAA expansion seem to be a multifactorial process, not solely described by PWS values but rather by a combination of mechanical, hemodynamic and biological factors.

Key concepts: Medicine, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Thrombus, Aneurysm, Hemodynamics, Nuclear medicine, Radiology, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Studying the expansion of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: is there a role for peak wall stress? — Research Paper | ScholarLens