1978PubMedRequires access

Withdrawal from positive end-expiratory pressure.

Arnold Luterman, J. Horovitz, C. James Carrico, Peter C. Canizaro, David M. Heimbach, J S Colocousis

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

A retrospective review was carried out involving 82 patients who required positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) therapy for acute respiratory insufficiency. One third of the attempts at reducing the level of PEEP were unsuccessful and led to reinstitution of the original or an increased level of PEEP. Premature lowering of PEEP resulted in significant deterioration in oxygenation which persisted for more than 24 hours after reinstitution of PEEP in a significant number of patients. In addition, one half of these patients required increased levels of PEEP (above prelowering levels) to achieve adequate oxygenation. PEEP lowering attempts were categorized as either successes or failures. A comparison was made between the prelowering respiratory measurements of these two groups. The discriminant criteria produced were (1) an improving oxygenation index (rising (PaO2/FIO2) and (2) a stable or improving effective compliance. Using these prelowering criteria, it was possible to distinguish between the successes and failures in 95% of cases. Based on the data collected, proposed guidelines for PEEP lowering are presented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A retrospective review was carried out involving 82 patients who required positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) therapy for acute respiratory insufficiency. One third of the attempts at reducing the level of PEEP were unsuccessful and led to reinstitution of the original or an increased level of PEEP. Premature lowering of PEEP resulted in significant deterioration in oxygenation which persisted for more than 24 hours after reinstitution of PEEP in a significant number of patients. In addition, one half of these patients required increased levels of PEEP (above prelowering levels) to achieve adequate oxygenation. PEEP lowering attempts were categorized as either successes or failures. A comparison was made between the prelowering respiratory measurements of these two groups. The discriminant criteria produced were (1) an improving oxygenation index (rising (PaO2/FIO2) and (2) a stable or improving effective compliance. Using these prelowering criteria, it was possible to distinguish between the successes and failures in 95% of cases. Based on the data collected, proposed guidelines for PEEP lowering are presented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A retrospective review was carried out involving 82 patients who required positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) therapy for acute respiratory insufficiency. One third of the attempts at reducing the level of PEEP were unsuccessful and led to reinstitution of the original or an increased level of PEEP. Premature lowering of PEEP resulted in significant deterioration in oxygenation which persisted for more than 24 hours after reinstitution of PEEP in a significant number of patients. In addition, one half of these patients required increased levels of PEEP (above prelowering levels) to achieve adequate oxygenation. PEEP lowering attempts were categorized as either successes or failures. A comparison was made between the prelowering respiratory measurements of these two groups. The discriminant criteria produced were (1) an improving oxygenation index (rising (PaO2/FIO2) and (2) a stable or improving effective compliance. Using these prelowering criteria, it was possible to distinguish between the successes and failures in 95% of cases. Based on the data collected, proposed guidelines for PEEP lowering are presented.

Key concepts: Medicine, Positive end-expiratory pressure, Oxygenation, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Anesthesia, Oxygenation index, Pulmonary compliance, Respiratory system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Withdrawal from positive end-expiratory pressure. — Research Paper | ScholarLens