2009Palgrave Macmillan US eBooksRequires access

Beyond Neoliberalism: Popular Responses to Social Change in Latin America

Kenneth M. Roberts

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

In recent years voters in Latin America have elected a series of left-of-center presidents, starting with Venezuela in 1998 and continuing (to date) with Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador, and Paraguay. Although this political “left turn” has bypassed a number of countries, and the new governments that are part of it comprise a remarkably heterogeneous lot, there seems little doubt that the political winds have shifted in the region. The turn to the left has followed a decade-and-a-half of free market or “neoliberal” reform, when technocrats throughout the region—with staunch support from the U.S. government and international financial institutions—forged a powerful policymaking consensus around the virtues of free trade, deregulated markets, and private entrepreneurship. Since it is not clear whether the region’s new leftist governments have identified, much less consolidated, viable alternatives to market liberalism, it is far too early to claim that Latin America has entered a post-neoliberal era of development. What is clear, however, is that the shift to the left signals a “repoliticization” of development issues in Latin America—that is, a demise of the “Washington Consensus” (Williamson 1990) for free market capitalism and the onset of a highly contested search for alternatives that lie “beyond neoliberalism.#x201D;

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In recent years voters in Latin America have elected a series of left-of-center presidents, starting with Venezuela in 1998 and continuing (to date) with Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador, and Paraguay. Although this political “left turn” has bypassed a number of countries, and the new governments that are part of it comprise a remarkably heterogeneous lot, there seems little doubt that the political winds have shifted in the region. The turn to the left has followed a decade-and-a-half of free market or “neoliberal” reform, when technocrats throughout the region—with staunch support from the U.S. government and international financial institutions—forged a powerful policymaking consensus around the virtues of free trade, deregulated markets, and private entrepreneurship. Since it is not clear whether the region’s new leftist governments have identified, much less consolidated, viable alternatives to market liberalism, it is far too early to claim that Latin America has entered a post-neoliberal era of development. What is clear, however, is that the shift to the left signals a “repoliticization” of development issues in Latin America—that is, a demise of the “Washington Consensus” (Williamson 1990) for free market capitalism and the onset of a highly contested search for alternatives that lie “beyond neoliberalism.#x201D;

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In recent years voters in Latin America have elected a series of left-of-center presidents, starting with Venezuela in 1998 and continuing (to date) with Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador, and Paraguay. Although this political “left turn” has bypassed a number of countries, and the new governments that are part of it comprise a remarkably heterogeneous lot, there seems little doubt that the political winds have shifted in the region. The turn to the left has followed a decade-and-a-half of free market or “neoliberal” reform, when technocrats throughout the region—with staunch support from the U.S. government and international financial institutions—forged a powerful policymaking consensus around the virtues of free trade, deregulated markets, and private entrepreneurship. Since it is not clear whether the region’s new leftist governments have identified, much less consolidated, viable alternatives to market liberalism, it is far too early to claim that Latin America has entered a post-neoliberal era of development. What is clear, however, is that the shift to the left signals a “repoliticization” of development issues in Latin America—that is, a demise of the “Washington Consensus” (Williamson 1990) for free market capitalism and the onset of a highly contested search for alternatives that lie “beyond neoliberalism.#x201D;

Key concepts: Latin Americans, Neoliberalism (international relations), Washington Consensus, Technocracy, Demise, Capitalism, Politics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Beyond Neoliberalism: Popular Responses to Social Change in Latin America — Research Paper | ScholarLens