2011•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Critiques of Teleological Judgement

Beth Lord

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The question of judging organized beings is central to the second half of the Critique of Judgment . In his essay on teleological principles, Kant had argued that organized nature requires us to think an intelligent supersensible cause if we are to avoid appeals to blind purposiveness or intelligent nature. The Critique of Teleological Judgment expands on this argument by establishing the necessity that we judge organized beings teleologically, and demonstrating that every alternative means for explaining natural purposes fails. This argument, at the heart of the Critique of Judgment , is directed explicitly against Herder and Spinozistic naturalism. It is here that we find Kant explicitly and extensively criticizing Spinoza. 1 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The question of judging organized beings is central to the second half of the Critique of Judgment . In his essay on teleological principles, Kant had argued that organized nature requires us to think an intelligent supersensible cause if we are to avoid appeals to blind purposiveness or intelligent nature. The Critique of Teleological Judgment expands on this argument by establishing the necessity that we judge organized beings teleologically, and demonstrating that every alternative means for explaining natural purposes fails. This argument, at the heart of the Critique of Judgment , is directed explicitly against Herder and Spinozistic naturalism. It is here that we find Kant explicitly and extensively criticizing Spinoza. 1 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The question of judging organized beings is central to the second half of the Critique of Judgment . In his essay on teleological principles, Kant had argued that organized nature requires us to think an intelligent supersensible cause if we are to avoid appeals to blind purposiveness or intelligent nature. The Critique of Teleological Judgment expands on this argument by establishing the necessity that we judge organized beings teleologically, and demonstrating that every alternative means for explaining natural purposes fails. This argument, at the heart of the Critique of Judgment , is directed explicitly against Herder and Spinozistic naturalism. It is here that we find Kant explicitly and extensively criticizing Spinoza. 1 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Teleology, Judgement, Naturalism, Epistemology, Argument (complex analysis), Philosophy, Teleological argument, Natural (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Critiques of Teleological Judgement — Research Paper | ScholarLens