2001•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comments on \Alternative models of demand for automobiles" by Charlotte Wojcik

Steve Berry, Ariel Pakes

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

In a recent paper in this journal, Wojcik (2000) argues that the nested logit model "is likely to be superior" to alternative random coefficients logit specifications, like those we and many others have used in recent work (e.g. Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995), henceforth BLP). Her conclusion is based on a within sample "prediction" exercise. We would like to raise several issues about her conclusion. 1. Most important to the Wojcik's specific conclusions, she uses different independent variables in her "BLP" based predictions as compared to in her nested logit predictions. In particular, for the nested logit predictions she appears to include on the right-hand side an additional variable that is a function of the left-hand side market shares being predicted. This endogenous variable (which would be unknown in a true out-of-sample prediction) could easily account for the apparent superiority of the nested logit, as no similar endog

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a recent paper in this journal, Wojcik (2000) argues that the nested logit model "is likely to be superior" to alternative random coefficients logit specifications, like those we and many others have used in recent work (e.g. Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995), henceforth BLP). Her conclusion is based on a within sample "prediction" exercise. We would like to raise several issues about her conclusion. 1. Most important to the Wojcik's specific conclusions, she uses different independent variables in her "BLP" based predictions as compared to in her nested logit predictions. In particular, for the nested logit predictions she appears to include on the right-hand side an additional variable that is a function of the left-hand side market shares being predicted. This endogenous variable (which would be unknown in a true out-of-sample prediction) could easily account for the apparent superiority of the nested logit, as no similar endog

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a recent paper in this journal, Wojcik (2000) argues that the nested logit model "is likely to be superior" to alternative random coefficients logit specifications, like those we and many others have used in recent work (e.g. Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995), henceforth BLP). Her conclusion is based on a within sample "prediction" exercise. We would like to raise several issues about her conclusion. 1. Most important to the Wojcik's specific conclusions, she uses different independent variables in her "BLP" based predictions as compared to in her nested logit predictions. In particular, for the nested logit predictions she appears to include on the right-hand side an additional variable that is a function of the left-hand side market shares being predicted. This endogenous variable (which would be unknown in a true out-of-sample prediction) could easily account for the apparent superiority of the nested logit, as no similar endog

Key concepts: Nested logit, Logit, Logistic regression, Mixed logit, Econometrics, Variable (mathematics), Function (biology), Logistic function

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comments on \Alternative models of demand for automobiles" by Charlotte Wojcik — Research Paper | ScholarLens