2008Journalism HistoryRequires access

The “Folk Problem”

Devon J. Powers

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This article examines the Village Voice's coverage of Greenwich Village's growing folk music scene. The Village's “folk problem” had three manifestations: the contentious role that folk played in changing the community dynamics of the Village; the issues of taste raised by folk as a new genre of music; and disputes within the folk community over commercialization, popularization, and electrification. The study argues that the Voice's approaches to folk expanded readers’ notions of popular music journalism and criticism, giving additional insight into the origins, purposes, and methods of critical consecration and serious writing about music. It also contends that the paper's popular music criticism deserves a more prominent place in journalism history, popular music studies, and mass communications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article examines the Village Voice's coverage of Greenwich Village's growing folk music scene. The Village's “folk problem” had three manifestations: the contentious role that folk played in changing the community dynamics of the Village; the issues of taste raised by folk as a new genre of music; and disputes within the folk community over commercialization, popularization, and electrification. The study argues that the Voice's approaches to folk expanded readers’ notions of popular music journalism and criticism, giving additional insight into the origins, purposes, and methods of critical consecration and serious writing about music. It also contends that the paper's popular music criticism deserves a more prominent place in journalism history, popular music studies, and mass communications.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article examines the Village Voice's coverage of Greenwich Village's growing folk music scene. The Village's “folk problem” had three manifestations: the contentious role that folk played in changing the community dynamics of the Village; the issues of taste raised by folk as a new genre of music; and disputes within the folk community over commercialization, popularization, and electrification. The study argues that the Voice's approaches to folk expanded readers’ notions of popular music journalism and criticism, giving additional insight into the origins, purposes, and methods of critical consecration and serious writing about music. It also contends that the paper's popular music criticism deserves a more prominent place in journalism history, popular music studies, and mass communications.

Key concepts: Consecration, Criticism, Folk music, Taste, Popular music, Aesthetics, Literature, Journalism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The “Folk Problem” — Research Paper | ScholarLens