What Americans Think of Taxes
Andrea Louise Campbell
Abstract
Andrea Louise Campbell
Abstract
Although taxation constitutes one of the main linkages between citizens and government, the study of public opinion and taxes has generally taken a backseat to accounts of the elite politics of tax policy. Given that ordinary citizens rarely pay much attention to public affairs, and often know little about complex policy issues such as taxation, this customary emphasis on elites is understandable. Moreover, the conventional wisdom that people simply hate taxes suggests that studying public opinion toward taxation would be a less than enlightening exercise. However, by utilizing newly available data on public opinion toward taxes, I find considerable variation in tax attitudes over the past six decades and argue that much of this variation can be explained by objective conditions, chiefly the cost of taxes. From the very beginning of mass taxation, ordinary Americans have been sensitive to the level of taxes they pay: When costs are higher, they have more negative feelings about taxes; when taxes are lower, they are relatively more sanguine. This is true both cross-sectionally – as shown in an analysis of early attitudes among different income groups toward regressive and progressive taxes – and across time, as demonstrated with longitudinal data. Moreover, the public's responsiveness to the cost of taxes has grown over time, with the relationship between tax attitudes and the level of taxes becoming tighter after the 1970s than it was before.
OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Although taxation constitutes one of the main linkages between citizens and government, the study of public opinion and taxes has generally taken a backseat to accounts of the elite politics of tax policy. Given that ordinary citizens rarely pay much attention to public affairs, and often know little about complex policy issues such as taxation, this customary emphasis on elites is understandable. Moreover, the conventional wisdom that people simply hate taxes suggests that studying public opinion toward taxation would be a less than enlightening exercise. However, by utilizing newly available data on public opinion toward taxes, I find considerable variation in tax attitudes over the past six decades and argue that much of this variation can be explained by objective conditions, chiefly the cost of taxes. From the very beginning of mass taxation, ordinary Americans have been sensitive to the level of taxes they pay: When costs are higher, they have more negative feelings about taxes; when taxes are lower, they are relatively more sanguine. This is true both cross-sectionally – as shown in an analysis of early attitudes among different income groups toward regressive and progressive taxes – and across time, as demonstrated with longitudinal data. Moreover, the public's responsiveness to the cost of taxes has grown over time, with the relationship between tax attitudes and the level of taxes becoming tighter after the 1970s than it was before.
Key concepts: Elite, Politics, Public opinion, Government (linguistics), Public economics, Public policy, Political science, Law and economics