1997•PubMedRequires access

How reproducible are measures of the anal sphincter muscle diameter by endoanal ultrasound?

Paul Enck, T Heyer, Beate Gantke, W U Schmidt, R Schäfer, Thomas Frieling, Dieter Häussinger

Open publisher page 57 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Anal endosonography is an imaging technique for the anal sphincter system and offers analysis of its muscular integrity. It is generally assumed that measurement of the thickness of muscle layers is provided by sonography; however, reproducibility of such measurements have not yet been investigated. METHODS: Study 1: In 10 healthy volunteers, endoanal ultrasound was performed independently by two experienced investigators with two different ultrasound machines, and thickness of the muscle layers of the internal and external anal sphincter was assessed in the position of the intermediate dorsal anal canal in a randomized cross-over fashion. Study 2: In a study of similar design, sonography was performed in nine healthy volunteers by two investigators independently using a single ultrasound machine in three standardized positions (proximal/intermediate/distal anal canal) and the sphincter layers assessed in the left, right, and dorsal segment. RESULTS: Study 1: Both the same investigator with different ultrasound scanners and different investigators with the same machine failed to obtain reproducible results with respect to internal and external anal sphincter muscle layer diameter (four bivariate correlations, all with p > 0.05). Study 2: Standardization of the probe position did not improve the agreement (2 x 9 bivariate correlations, all but two p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: At present, therefore, endoanal ultrasound does not provide reliable morphometric data on anal sphincter muscle diameter. This could explain previously conflicting observations of associations between anal sphincter morphometry and function.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

UNLABELLED: Anal endosonography is an imaging technique for the anal sphincter system and offers analysis of its muscular integrity. It is generally assumed that measurement of the thickness of muscle layers is provided by sonography; however, reproducibility of such measurements have not yet been investigated. METHODS: Study 1: In 10 healthy volunteers, endoanal ultrasound was performed independently by two experienced investigators with two different ultrasound machines, and thickness of the muscle layers of the internal and external anal sphincter was assessed in the position of the intermediate dorsal anal canal in a randomized cross-over fashion. Study 2: In a study of similar design, sonography was performed in nine healthy volunteers by two investigators independently using a single ultrasound machine in three standardized positions (proximal/intermediate/distal anal canal) and the sphincter layers assessed in the left, right, and dorsal segment. RESULTS: Study 1: Both the same investigator with different ultrasound scanners and different investigators with the same machine failed to obtain reproducible results with respect to internal and external anal sphincter muscle layer diameter (four bivariate correlations, all with p > 0.05). Study 2: Standardization of the probe position did not improve the agreement (2 x 9 bivariate correlations, all but two p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: At present, therefore, endoanal ultrasound does not provide reliable morphometric data on anal sphincter muscle diameter. This could explain previously conflicting observations of associations between anal sphincter morphometry and function.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

UNLABELLED: Anal endosonography is an imaging technique for the anal sphincter system and offers analysis of its muscular integrity. It is generally assumed that measurement of the thickness of muscle layers is provided by sonography; however, reproducibility of such measurements have not yet been investigated. METHODS: Study 1: In 10 healthy volunteers, endoanal ultrasound was performed independently by two experienced investigators with two different ultrasound machines, and thickness of the muscle layers of the internal and external anal sphincter was assessed in the position of the intermediate dorsal anal canal in a randomized cross-over fashion. Study 2: In a study of similar design, sonography was performed in nine healthy volunteers by two investigators independently using a single ultrasound machine in three standardized positions (proximal/intermediate/distal anal canal) and the sphincter layers assessed in the left, right, and dorsal segment. RESULTS: Study 1: Both the same investigator with different ultrasound scanners and different investigators with the same machine failed to obtain reproducible results with respect to internal and external anal sphincter muscle layer diameter (four bivariate correlations, all with p > 0.05). Study 2: Standardization of the probe position did not improve the agreement (2 x 9 bivariate correlations, all but two p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: At present, therefore, endoanal ultrasound does not provide reliable morphometric data on anal sphincter muscle diameter. This could explain previously conflicting observations of associations between anal sphincter morphometry and function.

Key concepts: Medicine, Internal anal sphincter, External anal sphincter, Endoanal ultrasound, Ultrasound, Anal canal, Sphincter, Anal sphincter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How reproducible are measures of the anal sphincter muscle diameter by endoanal ultrasound? — Research Paper | ScholarLens