1977PubMedRequires access

Failure of irradiated Echinostoma audyi and Hypoderaeum dingeri to sensitize Lymnaea rubiginosa snails.

Dondero Tj, Ow-Yang Ck, Lie Kj

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Attempts to induce acquired resistance in Lymnaea rubiginosa snails against the echinostomes Echinostoma audyi and Hypoderaeum dingeri by means of irradiated miracidia were unsuccessful, although Lie and coworkers using similar methods had recently sensitized Biomphalaria glabrata against Echinostoma lindoense (1975a). In contrast to the B. glabrata-E. lindoense system, in Lymnaea rubiginosa the amebocytic response to irradiated parasites was slow: irradiated E. audyi sporocysts were encapsulated 15 to 28 days and H. dingeri sporocysts 20 to 27 days postexposure. No obvious enlargement of the amebocyte-producing organ was seen. No resistance was demonstrable to subsequent homologous challenge. Development of acquired resistance to a trematode infection in snails may be related to the speed with which the snails destroy the irradiated sporocysts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Attempts to induce acquired resistance in Lymnaea rubiginosa snails against the echinostomes Echinostoma audyi and Hypoderaeum dingeri by means of irradiated miracidia were unsuccessful, although Lie and coworkers using similar methods had recently sensitized Biomphalaria glabrata against Echinostoma lindoense (1975a). In contrast to the B. glabrata-E. lindoense system, in Lymnaea rubiginosa the amebocytic response to irradiated parasites was slow: irradiated E. audyi sporocysts were encapsulated 15 to 28 days and H. dingeri sporocysts 20 to 27 days postexposure. No obvious enlargement of the amebocyte-producing organ was seen. No resistance was demonstrable to subsequent homologous challenge. Development of acquired resistance to a trematode infection in snails may be related to the speed with which the snails destroy the irradiated sporocysts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Attempts to induce acquired resistance in Lymnaea rubiginosa snails against the echinostomes Echinostoma audyi and Hypoderaeum dingeri by means of irradiated miracidia were unsuccessful, although Lie and coworkers using similar methods had recently sensitized Biomphalaria glabrata against Echinostoma lindoense (1975a). In contrast to the B. glabrata-E. lindoense system, in Lymnaea rubiginosa the amebocytic response to irradiated parasites was slow: irradiated E. audyi sporocysts were encapsulated 15 to 28 days and H. dingeri sporocysts 20 to 27 days postexposure. No obvious enlargement of the amebocyte-producing organ was seen. No resistance was demonstrable to subsequent homologous challenge. Development of acquired resistance to a trematode infection in snails may be related to the speed with which the snails destroy the irradiated sporocysts.

Key concepts: Biomphalaria glabrata, Lymnaea, Biology, Lymnaea stagnalis, Freshwater mollusc, Gastropoda, Snail, Trematoda

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Failure of irradiated Echinostoma audyi and Hypoderaeum dingeri to sensitize Lymnaea rubiginosa snails. — Research Paper | ScholarLens