1989•PubMedRequires access

[Infection caused by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. A comparative study].

M Ruhnke-Trautmann, Matthias Trautmann, O. Brückner, Th. Weinke, Jérôme E. Wagner

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The clinical symptomatology of bacterial septicemias was analysed in 417 patients of a University Hospital in West Berlin. Sepsis was caused by Gram-negative organisms in 229 cases, and by Gram-positive bacteria in 177 cases; 11 cases presented with a mixed type sepsis involving both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. With the exception of a drop in blood pressure, observed appreciably more often in Gram-negative infections (42.4% of the cases as compared with only 25.4% in the case of septicemia due to Gram-positive organisms, (p less than 0.01), no significant clinical differences were seen between Gram-negative and Gram-positive sepsis. Pathophysiological changes (thrombopenia, leukopenia, coagulopathies) that are considered classical reactions to endotoxin, were also observed in Gram-positive infections. The overall prognosis of septicemia was determined largely by the severity of the underlying pathological condition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The clinical symptomatology of bacterial septicemias was analysed in 417 patients of a University Hospital in West Berlin. Sepsis was caused by Gram-negative organisms in 229 cases, and by Gram-positive bacteria in 177 cases; 11 cases presented with a mixed type sepsis involving both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. With the exception of a drop in blood pressure, observed appreciably more often in Gram-negative infections (42.4% of the cases as compared with only 25.4% in the case of septicemia due to Gram-positive organisms, (p less than 0.01), no significant clinical differences were seen between Gram-negative and Gram-positive sepsis. Pathophysiological changes (thrombopenia, leukopenia, coagulopathies) that are considered classical reactions to endotoxin, were also observed in Gram-positive infections. The overall prognosis of septicemia was determined largely by the severity of the underlying pathological condition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The clinical symptomatology of bacterial septicemias was analysed in 417 patients of a University Hospital in West Berlin. Sepsis was caused by Gram-negative organisms in 229 cases, and by Gram-positive bacteria in 177 cases; 11 cases presented with a mixed type sepsis involving both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. With the exception of a drop in blood pressure, observed appreciably more often in Gram-negative infections (42.4% of the cases as compared with only 25.4% in the case of septicemia due to Gram-positive organisms, (p less than 0.01), no significant clinical differences were seen between Gram-negative and Gram-positive sepsis. Pathophysiological changes (thrombopenia, leukopenia, coagulopathies) that are considered classical reactions to endotoxin, were also observed in Gram-positive infections. The overall prognosis of septicemia was determined largely by the severity of the underlying pathological condition.

Key concepts: Gram, Sepsis, Gram-negative bacteria, Leukopenia, Gram-positive bacteria, Medicine, Pathological, Bacteria

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Infection caused by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. A comparative study]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens