2004•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Understanding the European Union as a Global Actor

George Christou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The European Union’s (EU) ability to prevent conflict has traditionally been measured through the developments in its Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) capabilities, and more recently, by the development of a European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). Indeed, the instruments and resources to operationalise a ‘common’ CFSP and ESDP have continued apace since the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 with major innovations including the appointment of Javier Solana as the High Representative of the CFSP (1997 Amsterdam Treaty) to strengthen the identity and profile of the EU abroad, and the introduction of a European Rapid Reaction Force to strengthen the capacity of the Union to act in crisis management (agreed at the Helsinki Summit in 1999). However, although it is clear that substantial progress has been made, the ‘hard security’ instruments of the EU are, in reality, still in developmental form, 1 in particular with regard to institutional innovation, decision-making and coordination: problems in agreeing to a position on Iraq (March 2003) bear testament to the existing problems in these areas. 2 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The European Union’s (EU) ability to prevent conflict has traditionally been measured through the developments in its Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) capabilities, and more recently, by the development of a European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). Indeed, the instruments and resources to operationalise a ‘common’ CFSP and ESDP have continued apace since the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 with major innovations including the appointment of Javier Solana as the High Representative of the CFSP (1997 Amsterdam Treaty) to strengthen the identity and profile of the EU abroad, and the introduction of a European Rapid Reaction Force to strengthen the capacity of the Union to act in crisis management (agreed at the Helsinki Summit in 1999). However, although it is clear that substantial progress has been made, the ‘hard security’ instruments of the EU are, in reality, still in developmental form, 1 in particular with regard to institutional innovation, decision-making and coordination: problems in agreeing to a position on Iraq (March 2003) bear testament to the existing problems in these areas. 2 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The European Union’s (EU) ability to prevent conflict has traditionally been measured through the developments in its Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) capabilities, and more recently, by the development of a European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). Indeed, the instruments and resources to operationalise a ‘common’ CFSP and ESDP have continued apace since the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 with major innovations including the appointment of Javier Solana as the High Representative of the CFSP (1997 Amsterdam Treaty) to strengthen the identity and profile of the EU abroad, and the introduction of a European Rapid Reaction Force to strengthen the capacity of the Union to act in crisis management (agreed at the Helsinki Summit in 1999). However, although it is clear that substantial progress has been made, the ‘hard security’ instruments of the EU are, in reality, still in developmental form, 1 in particular with regard to institutional innovation, decision-making and coordination: problems in agreeing to a position on Iraq (March 2003) bear testament to the existing problems in these areas. 2 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Summit, European union, Political science, Security policy, Position (finance), Maastricht Treaty, Treaty, International trade

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Understanding the European Union as a Global Actor — Research Paper | ScholarLens