1993PubMedRequires access

Effects of dentin age and bonding on microgap formation.

Mixson Jm, Richards Nd, Mitchell Rj

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of dentin adhesives in extracted molars from younger (16-26) and older (58-87) human subjects. Extracted molars were selected to be restored with one of two dentin bonding agents (n = 22 per group). Opposite sides of each molar were ground flat and a 3 mm x 3 mm cylindrical preparation was milled into each surface. The opposing surfaces of each molar were then randomly restored with either a dentin bonding system that adhered to the dentin smear layer or one which bonded to the dentin after the smear layer was removed. All samples were examined at x150 to determine both the maximum gap in micrometers and extent of the gap in degrees. There were significantly shorter (P < 0.05) microgaps in older dentin with a bonding system that removed smear layer. This bonding system also produced shorter gaps in older dentin than in younger dentin. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of gap-free margins between age groups.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study compared the effectiveness of dentin adhesives in extracted molars from younger (16-26) and older (58-87) human subjects. Extracted molars were selected to be restored with one of two dentin bonding agents (n = 22 per group). Opposite sides of each molar were ground flat and a 3 mm x 3 mm cylindrical preparation was milled into each surface. The opposing surfaces of each molar were then randomly restored with either a dentin bonding system that adhered to the dentin smear layer or one which bonded to the dentin after the smear layer was removed. All samples were examined at x150 to determine both the maximum gap in micrometers and extent of the gap in degrees. There were significantly shorter (P < 0.05) microgaps in older dentin with a bonding system that removed smear layer. This bonding system also produced shorter gaps in older dentin than in younger dentin. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of gap-free margins between age groups.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of dentin adhesives in extracted molars from younger (16-26) and older (58-87) human subjects. Extracted molars were selected to be restored with one of two dentin bonding agents (n = 22 per group). Opposite sides of each molar were ground flat and a 3 mm x 3 mm cylindrical preparation was milled into each surface. The opposing surfaces of each molar were then randomly restored with either a dentin bonding system that adhered to the dentin smear layer or one which bonded to the dentin after the smear layer was removed. All samples were examined at x150 to determine both the maximum gap in micrometers and extent of the gap in degrees. There were significantly shorter (P < 0.05) microgaps in older dentin with a bonding system that removed smear layer. This bonding system also produced shorter gaps in older dentin than in younger dentin. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of gap-free margins between age groups.

Key concepts: Dentin, Molar, Smear layer, Adhesive, Dentistry, Materials science, Molar ratio, Layer (electronics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of dentin age and bonding on microgap formation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens